Suppr超能文献

改良脑室-腹腔分流术用于临时外引流

Modified ventriculoperitoneal shunt applied to temporary external ventricular drainage.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Xiangshanyikesong 50#, HaiDian District, Beijing, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Sanbo Funeng Brain Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66917-x.

Abstract

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a common procedure in neurosurgical practice. Presently, the three methods used most often include direct EVD (dEVD), long-tunneled external ventricular drains (LTEVDs), and EVD via the Ommaya reservoir (EVDvOR). But they possess drawbacks such as limited duration of retention, vulnerability to iatrogenic secondary infections, and challenges in regulating drainage flow. This study aimed to explore the use of a modified ventriculoperitoneal shunt (mVPS)-the abdominal end of the VPS device was placed externally-as a means of temporary EVD to address the aforementioned limitations. This retrospective cohort study, included 120 cases requiring EVD. dEVD was performed for 31 cases, EVDvOR for 54 cases (including 8 cases with previously performed dEVD), and mVPS for 35 cases (including 6 cases with previously performed EVDvOR). The one-time success rate (no need for further other EVD intervention) for dEVD, EVDvOR, and mVPS were 70.97%, 88.89%, and 91.42%, dEVD vs EVDvOR (P < 0.05), dEVD vs mVPS (P < 0.05), EVDvOR vs mVPS (P > 0.05). Puncture needle displacement or detachment was observed in nearly all cases of EVDvOR, while no such complications have been observed with mVPS. Apart from this complication, the incidence of postoperative complications was 35.48%, 14.81%, and 8.5%, dEVD vs EVDvOR (P < 0.05), dEVD vs mVPS (P < 0.05), EVDvOR vs mVPS (P > 0.05). Mean postoperative retention for EVD was 14.68 ± 9.50 days, 25.96 ± 15.14 days, and 82.43 ± 64.45 days, respectively (P < 0.001). In conclusion, mVPS significantly extends the duration of EVD, which is particularly beneficial for patients requiring long-term EVD.

摘要

脑室外引流(EVD)是神经外科实践中的一种常见程序。目前,最常使用的三种方法包括直接 EVD(dEVD)、长隧道外脑室外引流(LTEVDs)和 Ommaya 储液器的 EVD(EVDvOR)。但它们存在保留时间有限、易发生医源性继发感染以及引流流量调节困难等缺点。本研究旨在探讨使用改良脑室-腹腔分流术(mVPS)——将 VPS 装置的腹部端置于体外——作为一种临时 EVD 方法来解决上述限制。这项回顾性队列研究共纳入 120 例需要 EVD 的患者。31 例行 dEVD,54 例行 EVDvOR(其中 8 例之前行 dEVD),35 例行 mVPS(其中 6 例之前行 EVDvOR)。dEVD、EVDvOR 和 mVPS 的一次性成功率(无需进一步其他 EVD 干预)分别为 70.97%、88.89%和 91.42%,dEVD 与 EVDvOR 比较(P<0.05),dEVD 与 mVPS 比较(P<0.05),EVDvOR 与 mVPS 比较(P>0.05)。几乎所有 EVDvOR 病例均出现穿刺针移位或脱落,而 mVPS 无此类并发症。除了这种并发症,术后并发症的发生率分别为 35.48%、14.81%和 8.5%,dEVD 与 EVDvOR 比较(P<0.05),dEVD 与 mVPS 比较(P<0.05),EVDvOR 与 mVPS 比较(P>0.05)。EVD 的平均术后保留时间分别为 14.68±9.50 天、25.96±15.14 天和 82.43±64.45 天(P<0.001)。综上所述,mVPS 显著延长了 EVD 的持续时间,这对需要长期 EVD 的患者特别有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/11239655/1b83e19ecc66/41598_2024_66917_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验