Silva Trevor S, Firek Matthew, Albini Paul, Caba Molina David
Hepatobiliary Surgery, Portland Providence Medical Center, Portland, USA.
Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center (CECORC), Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 11;16(6):e62187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62187. eCollection 2024 Jun.
A majority of gallbladder cancers present incidentally. Operative risk factors and outcomes for laparoscopic converted to open cholecystectomy in incidental gallbladder cancer are not well characterized.
Patients with incidental gallbladder cancer and acute cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conversion to open cholecystectomy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) from 2010-2019 were reviewed. The primary endpoint was risk factors for conversion to open cholecystectomy in incidental gallbladder cancer. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.
A total of 5,789 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were identified, of which, 50 (0.9%) had incidental gallbladder cancer. For incidental gallbladder cancer patients, there were no differences in preoperative profile and risk factors between laparoscopic and converted to open cholecystectomy groups. Incidental carcinoma patients undergoing conversion to open cholecystectomy had lower preoperative sodium levels than the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (P=0.007). Hospital length of stay (days) was longer for those with a conversion to open cholecystectomy for incidental carcinoma compared to non-conversion, 14 (10.8, 18.8) vs 2 (0.3, 5) (P=0.004). The patients converted to open cholecystectomy also had higher rates of postoperative sepsis (50% vs 0%, P<0.001) and reoperation than the laparoscopic cohort (50% vs 2.2%, P<0.001). Readmission and mortality rates, among other complications, were not significantly different between both surgical approaches in incidental gallbladder cancer patients.
Patients with conversion to open cholecystectomy had worse outcomes including longer hospital stays and higher rates of sepsis and reoperation. It remains difficult to predict which incidental gallbladder patients will require a conversion to open surgery. Further study examining whether more complicated recovery results in worse oncologic outcomes is warranted.
大多数胆囊癌是偶然发现的。偶然胆囊癌患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹胆囊切除术的手术风险因素及预后特征尚不明确。
回顾2010年至2019年美国外科医师学会(ACS)国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中因偶然胆囊癌和急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术并中转开腹胆囊切除术的患者。主要终点是偶然胆囊癌中转开腹胆囊切除术的风险因素。分类变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。连续变量采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。
共识别出5789例行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,其中50例(0.9%)患有偶然胆囊癌。对于偶然胆囊癌患者,腹腔镜组和中转开腹胆囊切除术组术前特征和风险因素无差异。偶然癌患者中转开腹胆囊切除术组术前钠水平低于腹腔镜胆囊切除术组(P = 0.007)。偶然癌中转开腹胆囊切除术患者的住院时间(天)比未中转者更长,分别为14(10.8,18.8)天和2(0.3,5)天(P = 0.004)。中转开腹胆囊切除术的患者术后脓毒症发生率(50% vs 0%,P < 0.001)和再次手术率也高于腹腔镜组(50% vs 2.2%,P < 0.001)。偶然胆囊癌患者两种手术方式的再入院率和死亡率以及其他并发症发生率无显著差异。
中转开腹胆囊切除术的患者预后较差,包括住院时间更长、脓毒症发生率和再次手术率更高。仍难以预测哪些偶然胆囊患者需要中转开腹手术。有必要进一步研究更复杂的恢复情况是否会导致更差的肿瘤学预后。