Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Ann Surg. 2024 Sep 1;280(3):480-490. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006404. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
This study aimed to evaluate the association of surgeon self-reported gender on clinical outcomes in contemporary US surgical practice.
Previous research has suggested that there are potentially improved surgical outcomes for female surgeons, yet the underlying causal path for this association remains unclear.
Using the Vizient Clinical Database(2016-2021), 39 operations categorized by the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network were analyzed. The surgeon self-reported gender as the primary exposure. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital death, complications, and/or 30-day readmission. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching were used for risk adjustment.
The analysis included 4,882,784 patients operated on by 11,955 female surgeons (33% of surgeons performing 21% of procedures) and 23,799 male surgeons (67% of surgeons performing 79% of procedures). Female surgeons were younger (45±9 vs males-53±11 y; P <0.0001) and had lower operative volumes. Unadjusted incidence of the primary outcome was 13.6%(10.7%-female surgeons, 14.3%-male surgeons; P <0.0001). After propensity matching, the primary outcome occurred in 13.0% of patients [12.9%-female, 13.0%-male; OR (M vs. F)=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; P =0.001), with female surgeons having small statistical associations with lower mortality and complication rates but not readmissions. Procedure-specific analyses revealed inconsistent or no surgeon-gender associations.
In the largest analysis to date, surgeon self-reported gender had a small statistical, clinically marginal correlation with postoperative outcomes. The variation across surgical specialties and procedures suggests that the association with surgeon gender is unlikely causal for the observed differences in outcomes. Patients should be reassured that surgeon gender alone does not have a clinically meaningful impact on their outcome.
本研究旨在评估美国当代外科实践中外科医生自我报告的性别与临床结果之间的关联。
先前的研究表明,女性外科医生可能会有更好的手术结果,但这种关联的潜在因果关系尚不清楚。
使用 Vizient 临床数据库(2016-2021 年),对疾病预防控制中心国家医疗保健安全网络分类的 39 种手术进行了分析。外科医生自我报告的性别为主要暴露因素。主要结果是住院期间死亡、并发症和/或 30 天再入院的综合指标。多变量逻辑回归和倾向评分匹配用于风险调整。
该分析包括 4882784 名由 11955 名女性外科医生(实施 21%手术的 33%的外科医生)和 23799 名男性外科医生(实施 79%手术的 67%的外科医生)进行手术的患者。女性外科医生更年轻(45±9 岁比男性-53±11 岁;P<0.0001),手术量也较低。未调整的主要结果发生率为 13.6%(女性 10.7%,男性 14.3%;P<0.0001)。在倾向匹配后,主要结果发生在 13.0%的患者中[女性 12.9%,男性 13.0%;OR(M 与 F)=1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.03;P=0.001],女性外科医生的死亡率和并发症率较低,但再入院率没有统计学差异。具体手术的分析显示,外科医生性别与手术结果之间没有一致或没有关联。
在迄今为止最大的分析中,外科医生自我报告的性别与术后结果仅有很小的统计学上的、临床意义上的相关性。不同外科专业和手术之间的差异表明,外科医生性别与观察到的结果差异之间的关联不太可能是因果关系。患者应该放心,外科医生的性别对他们的结果没有临床意义上的影响。