Suppr超能文献

识别自杀矛盾心理的潜在类别:与自杀风险相关因素和结局的关联。

Identifying latent classes of suicidal ambivalence: Associations with suicide risk correlates and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

Department of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024 Oct;54(5):844-859. doi: 10.1111/sltb.13111. Epub 2024 Jul 12.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research has largely conceptualized suicidal ambivalence as the difference between one's wish to live and wish to die without fully considering other suicide ideation (SI) experiences included on measures like the Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS). We utilized BSS items to identify SI latent classes and examined relevant correlates and outcomes.

METHODS

We collected self-report data from two samples of US adults who: (1) self-identified as LGBTQ+ (N = 349; cross-sectional) and (2) self-reported past-week SI (BSS score ≥ 11; N = 133; 3 timepoints).

RESULTS

Latent class analyses supported three-class (Sample 1) and four-class solutions (Sample 2), which included ambivalent classes. In Sample 1, sexual orientation, gender, depression, anxiety, SI, and suicide-specific rumination were concurrently associated with class membership. In Sample 2, depression, SI, suicide-specific rumination, and physical/psychological distance from suicide methods were concurrently associated with class membership. In Sample 2, at both follow-ups, suicide plans/preparations and Acute Suicidal Affective Disturbance symptom frequencies were provided by class membership, and suicidal intent significantly differed by class membership.

CONCLUSIONS

SI classes differed by sample and evidenced nuances in SI and suicidal ambivalence. Risk factors and suicide-related outcomes also differed by class membership. Implications and limitations are discussed.

摘要

简介

研究主要将自杀矛盾心理概念化为对生活的渴望和对死亡的渴望之间的差异,而没有充分考虑到贝克自杀意念量表(BSS)等测量工具中包含的其他自杀意念(SI)体验。我们利用 BSS 项目来确定 SI 的潜在类别,并研究了相关的相关性和结果。

方法

我们从两个美国成年人样本中收集了自我报告数据:(1)自我认同为 LGBTQ+(N=349;横断面研究)和(2)报告过去一周有 SI(BSS 得分≥11;N=133;3 个时间点)。

结果

潜在类别分析支持了三类别(样本 1)和四类别(样本 2)解决方案,其中包括矛盾类别。在样本 1 中,性取向、性别、抑郁、焦虑、SI 和自杀特定的沉思与类别成员身份同时相关。在样本 2 中,抑郁、SI、自杀特定的沉思以及与自杀方法的身体/心理距离与类别成员身份同时相关。在样本 2 中,在两次随访中,自杀计划/准备以及急性自杀情感障碍症状的频率都是由类别成员身份提供的,自杀意图因类别成员身份而显著不同。

结论

SI 类别因样本而异,表明 SI 和自杀矛盾心理存在细微差别。风险因素和与自杀相关的结果也因类别成员身份而异。讨论了其意义和局限性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Suicidal ambivalence: A scoping review.自杀矛盾心理:范围综述。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024 Oct;54(5):802-813. doi: 10.1111/sltb.13092. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Facets of Suicidal Ideation.自杀意念面面观。
Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Oct-Dec;28(4):1263-1278. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2299259. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
10
Reflections on Suicidal Ideation.关于自杀意念的思考
Crisis. 2019 Jul;40(4):227-230. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000615.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验