Department of Medical Microbiology, Health Sciences University Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Center for Anti-Infective Research & Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, 06102, CT, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Sep;43(9):1787-1794. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04896-7. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
Carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA) is escalating worldwide and leaves clinicians few therapeutic options in recent years, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection and have shown potent activity against isolates defined as carbapenem resistant. The aim of this study was to determine the phenotypic profile of these agents against CR-PA in the emerging setting of carbapenemases.
CR-PA clinical isolates were collected from three teaching hospitals in different geographical regions between January 2017-December 2021. All isolates were subjected to phenotypic carbapenemase testing using modified carbapenem inactivation method. MICs were determined by reference broth microdilution and evaluated according to EUCAST standards, while genotypic profiling was determined using PCR methods.
244 CR-PA sourced most frequently from the respiratory tract (32.2%), blood (20.4%) and urine (17.5%) were evaluated. Of all isolates, 32 (13.1%) were phenotypically and 38 (15.6%) were genotypically defined as carbapenemase-positive. The most common carbapenemase was GES (63.1%), followed by VIM (15.8%). The MIC(S%) of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and cefiderocol in all CR-PA isolates were 4 and 32 (80%), 1 and > 64 (69%) and 0.25 and 1 mg/L (96%), respectively. Cefiderocol was also the most active agent in carbapenemase-positive isolates (90%).
While ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam remained highly active against CR-PA devoid of carbapenemases, cefiderocol provided potent in vitro activity irrespective of carbapenemase production. When considering the potential clinical utility of newer agents against CR-PA, regional variations in carbapenemase prevalence must be considered.
碳青霉烯类耐药铜绿假单胞菌(CR-PA)在全球范围内不断蔓延,近年来临床医生的治疗选择有限。β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂合剂(头孢他洛酯-他唑巴坦、头孢噻肟-阿维巴坦)和新型铁载体头孢菌素(头孢地尔)已被批准用于治疗铜绿假单胞菌感染,并对被定义为碳青霉烯类耐药的分离株表现出强大的活性。本研究旨在确定这些药物在新兴的碳青霉烯酶环境下对 CR-PA 的表型特征。
从 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,在三个地理位置不同的教学医院收集 CR-PA 临床分离株。所有分离株均采用改良碳青霉烯失活法进行表型碳青霉烯酶检测。微量肉汤稀释法测定 MIC,并根据 EUCAST 标准进行评估,而基因谱分析则采用 PCR 方法。
共评估了 244 株源自呼吸道(32.2%)、血液(20.4%)和尿液(17.5%)的 CR-PA。所有分离株中,32 株(13.1%)为表型阳性,38 株(15.6%)为基因阳性。最常见的碳青霉烯酶为 GES(63.1%),其次是 VIM(15.8%)。所有 CR-PA 分离株中头孢他洛酯-他唑巴坦、头孢噻肟-阿维巴坦和头孢地尔的 MIC(%)分别为 4 和 32(80%)、1 和>64(69%)和 0.25 和 1mg/L(96%)。在碳青霉烯酶阳性分离株中,头孢地尔也是最有效的药物(90%)。
虽然头孢他洛酯-他唑巴坦和头孢噻肟-阿维巴坦对无碳青霉烯酶的 CR-PA 仍具有高度活性,但头孢地尔无论是否产生碳青霉烯酶,均具有强大的体外活性。在考虑新型药物对 CR-PA 的潜在临床应用时,必须考虑碳青霉烯酶流行率的区域差异。