Department of Oncology, Lu'an Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No.21 of Wanxi Avenue, Lu'an, 237005, Anhui, China. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2024 Jul 1;30(7):e198-e202. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89581.
To analyze patient satisfaction with letter-based communication of lung cancer screening (LCS) pulmonary nodule results.
Prospective randomized controlled trial of LCS between May and December 2019.
All participants came from a prospective randomized controlled study on pulmonary nodule results in LCS with low-dose CT (LDCT) to analyze patient satisfaction, perception of information received via letters, preferred methods of receiving results, and dissatisfaction-related characteristics.
A total of 153 patients were detected to have pulmonary nodules among 600 recruited participants in the lung cancer high-risk group screened using LDCT. Most of the patients were satisfied with receiving pulmonary nodule results via letters (78.4%; n = 120) and agreed that the letters contained an appropriate amount of information (83.7%; n = 128). Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that satisfaction was related to age (OR, 0.905; 95% CI, 0.832-0.985), education level (OR, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.041-3.250), no family history of cancer (OR, 0.100; 95% CI, 0.011-0.914), and the number of nodules (OR, 6.028; 95% CI, 1.641-22.141). Of the patients who reported dissatisfaction with letter-based communication (7.2%; n = 11), the most common reasons cited were that they contained insufficient patient education materials and that it was difficult to comprehend the medical terminology. The majority of participants (61.4%; n = 94) reported that they would prefer the letter-based communication. No correlation was identified between satisfaction and gender, smoking status, alcohol consumption, risk factors, nodule size, or nodule location.
Patients were generally satisfied with receiving their LCS pulmonary nodule results via letters, reporting that the letters included adequate information about their diagnosis and follow-up steps. This may provide a basis for feasible result communication via letters for cancer screening programs in underdeveloped regions in China.
分析肺癌筛查(LCS)肺结节结果以信函形式沟通患者满意度。
2019 年 5 月至 12 月期间进行的 LCS 与低剂量 CT(LDCT)前瞻性随机对照试验。
所有参与者均来自 LCS 肺结节结果的前瞻性随机对照研究,该研究对肺癌高危人群进行 LDCT 筛查,用于分析患者满意度、对信函中收到信息的感知、对结果接收方式的偏好,以及与不满相关的特征。
在对 600 名肺癌高危人群进行 LDCT 筛查中,共发现 153 名患者肺结节。大多数患者对通过信函接收肺结节结果表示满意(78.4%;n=120),并认为信函中包含适量的信息(83.7%;n=128)。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,满意度与年龄(OR,0.905;95%CI,0.832-0.985)、教育程度(OR,0.367;95%CI,0.041-3.250)、无癌症家族史(OR,0.100;95%CI,0.011-0.914)和结节数量(OR,6.028;95%CI,1.641-22.141)有关。报告对信函沟通不满意的患者(7.2%;n=11)中,最常见的原因是信函中缺少患者教育材料,以及难以理解医学术语。大多数患者(61.4%;n=94)表示,他们更愿意通过信函沟通。满意度与性别、吸烟状况、饮酒状况、危险因素、结节大小或结节位置均无相关性。
患者普遍对通过信函接收 LCS 肺结节结果表示满意,认为信函中包含了有关诊断和随访步骤的充分信息。这可能为中国欠发达地区的癌症筛查项目通过信函进行可行的结果沟通提供依据。