Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.
Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct;154(4):988-995.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
General pediatric providers are the front line for early peanut introduction discussions, but many providers believe that they are ill-equipped to handle such discussions, as the guidelines have changed quickly.
We hypothesized that a clinical decision support (CDS) tool could improve discussions of peanut introduction.
CDS tools were designed by stakeholders, improved through usability testing, and integrated into the current note templates. On the basis of queries of electronic health records, we did a preperformance versus postperformance evaluation of conversations regarding peanut introduction, barriers to peanut introduction, and percentage of 12-month well-child checkups (WCCs) that resulted in successful introduction of peanut. Providers completed surveys before and after intervention to assess their awareness of early peanut introduction and comfort using the CDS tools.
Providers' awareness of early peanut introduction guidelines increased from 17.8% to 66.7% after the CDS tool was implemented; 79.1% of the providers were comfortable using the tool. The CDS tool improved peanut introduction conversations at the 4-month WCC from 2.4% to 81.2%, at the 6-month WCC from 3.0% to 84.2%, and at the 12-month WCC from 2.7% to 82.9%. In all, 56.6% of families had a plan to introduce peanut at the 4-month WCC. Of those who did not have a plan, the most common barrier was the family's unawareness of the benefits of early peanut introduction. At the 12-month WCC, 62.8% of families had introduced peanut without concerns.
A point-of-care CDS tool encouraged more discussions of early peanut introduction between general pediatric providers and all patients. CDS tools should be considered in quality improvement projects as an implementation method for the most up-to-date guidelines.
一般儿科医生是早期引入花生讨论的第一线,但许多医生认为,由于指南变化迅速,他们没有能力处理此类讨论。
我们假设临床决策支持(CDS)工具可以改善花生引入的讨论。
由利益相关者设计 CDS 工具,通过可用性测试进行改进,并集成到当前的记录模板中。根据电子病历的查询,我们对有关花生引入、花生引入障碍以及导致 12 个月儿童健康检查(WCC)成功引入花生的百分比的对话进行了绩效前后评估。在干预前后,医生完成了一项调查,以评估他们对早期花生引入指南的认识和使用 CDS 工具的舒适度。
在实施 CDS 工具后,医生对早期花生引入指南的认识从 17.8%提高到 66.7%;79.1%的医生使用该工具感到舒适。CDS 工具将 4 个月 WCC 的花生引入对话从 2.4%提高到 81.2%,6 个月 WCC 的对话从 3.0%提高到 84.2%,12 个月 WCC 的对话从 2.7%提高到 82.9%。在所有 WCC 中,56.6%的家庭计划在 4 个月 WCC 时引入花生。在没有计划的家庭中,最常见的障碍是家庭对早期引入花生的益处不了解。在 12 个月 WCC 时,62.8%的家庭在没有任何顾虑的情况下引入了花生。
一种基于计算机的 CDS 工具鼓励一般儿科医生与所有患者更多地讨论早期引入花生。在质量改进项目中,应考虑使用 CDS 工具作为最新指南的实施方法。