Suppr超能文献

对于妇科手术后的患者,与单独使用渐进性加压弹力袜相比,联合使用渐进性加压弹力袜和间歇性气动加压在预防深静脉血栓形成方面效果更佳:一项荟萃分析。

Combination of graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression is better in preventing deep venous thrombosis than graduated compression stockings alone for patients following gynecological surgery: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lu Limei, Shen Ya, Pan Yuping

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology, Huzhou Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.

Nursing Department, Huzhou Maternity & Child Health Care Hospital, No 2 East Road, Wuxing District, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Thromb J. 2024 Jul 12;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00636-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is common in patients undergoing gynecological surgery. We aimed to investigate the preventive efficacy in DVT of graduated compression stockings (GCS) alone and in combination with intermittent pneumatic compression (GCS + IPC) after gynecological surgery.

METHODS

In November 2022, studies on the use of GCS and GCS + IPC for the prevention of DVT after gynecological surgery were searched in seven databases. After literature screening and data extraction based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, preventive efficacies, including the risk of DVT and anticoagulation function, of GCS and GCS + IPC were compared. Finally, sensitivity analysis and Egger's test were performed to evaluate the stability of the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six publications with moderate quality were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that GCS + IPC significantly reduced DVT risk (P = 0.0002) and D-dimer levels (P = 0.0005) compared with GCS alone. Sensitivity analysis and Egger's test showed that the combined results of this study were stable and reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with GCS alone, GCS + IPS showed a higher preventive efficacy against DVT in patients following gynecological surgery.

摘要

背景

深静脉血栓形成(DVT)在接受妇科手术的患者中很常见。我们旨在研究分级压力弹力袜(GCS)单独使用以及与间歇充气加压联合使用(GCS + IPC)对妇科手术后DVT的预防效果。

方法

2022年11月,在七个数据库中检索了关于使用GCS和GCS + IPC预防妇科手术后DVT的研究。根据特定的纳入和排除标准进行文献筛选和数据提取后,比较了GCS和GCS + IPC的预防效果,包括DVT风险和抗凝功能。最后,进行敏感性分析和Egger检验以评估荟萃分析的稳定性。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了6篇质量中等的出版物。结果显示,与单独使用GCS相比,GCS + IPC显著降低了DVT风险(P = 0.0002)和D - 二聚体水平(P = 0.0005)。敏感性分析和Egger检验表明,本研究的合并结果稳定可靠。

结论

与单独使用GCS相比,GCS + IPS对妇科手术后患者DVT的预防效果更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cde8/11245769/a3b91efc8846/12959_2024_636_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验