• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然风险和非农业收入对中国东北地区农业托管决策的影响

Influence of Natural Risks and Non-Agricultural Income on Agricultural Trusteeship Decisions in Northeast China.

作者信息

Xue Ying, Liu Hongbin

机构信息

College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.

College of Economics and Management, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Jun 26;13(13):2024. doi: 10.3390/foods13132024.

DOI:10.3390/foods13132024
PMID:38998530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11241465/
Abstract

As the main service mode and management mode of socialized service, agricultural production trusteeship services (APTS) are an important way to realize the tight link between farmers and modern agricultural development, which is highly important for ensuring national food security. By constructing a utility model of farmers, this paper deduces the decision-making mechanism of farmers' APTS from the dual mechanism of natural risk and non-agricultural employment income (NAEI) and uses the survey data of 956 farmers in the three northeastern provinces to verify the empirical results by using multivariate logit (Mlogit) and propensity score matching (PSM) methods. The research shows that natural risk hinders farmers' choice of the APTS; NAEI has a positive impact on APST, and an increase in NAEI weakens the negative effect of natural risk on the choice of the APTS, and has an enhanced moderating effect. In addition, the scale heterogeneity analysis revealed that the impacts of natural risk and NAEI on farmers of different scales are significantly different. The NAEI adjustment effect has the greatest impact on small-scale farmers, followed by medium-scale farmers. In view of this, the government should stabilize the nonagricultural employment market and improve the nonagricultural employment opportunities of farmers. APTS organizations should transfer natural risks and improve the agricultural insurance system. According to the differences of different scales of farmers, different promotion policies are formulated, and the expansion of management and deepening services is proposed to further promote the development of APTS and consolidate the foundation of food security in China.

摘要

作为社会化服务的主要服务模式和经营模式,农业生产托管服务是实现农民与现代农业发展紧密衔接的重要途径,对保障国家粮食安全具有重要意义。本文通过构建农户效用模型,从自然风险和非农就业收入双重机制推导农户农业生产托管服务的决策机制,并利用东北三省956户农户的调查数据,采用多元logit模型(Mlogit)和倾向得分匹配法(PSM)对实证结果进行验证。研究表明,自然风险阻碍农户选择农业生产托管服务;非农就业收入对农业生产托管服务选择具有正向影响,且非农就业收入的增加会减弱自然风险对农业生产托管服务选择的负向影响,并具有增强的调节效应。此外,规模异质性分析表明,自然风险和非农就业收入对不同规模农户的影响存在显著差异。非农就业收入调节效应对小农户影响最大,其次是中等规模农户。鉴于此,政府应稳定非农就业市场,提高农户非农就业机会。农业生产托管服务组织应转嫁自然风险,完善农业保险体系。根据不同规模农户的差异,制定差异化的推广政策,提出拓展经营与深化服务,以进一步推动农业生产托管服务发展,筑牢我国粮食安全根基。

相似文献

1
Influence of Natural Risks and Non-Agricultural Income on Agricultural Trusteeship Decisions in Northeast China.自然风险和非农业收入对中国东北地区农业托管决策的影响
Foods. 2024 Jun 26;13(13):2024. doi: 10.3390/foods13132024.
2
Effects of risk perception and agricultural socialized services on farmers' organic fertilizer application behavior: Evidence from Shandong Province, China.风险感知和农业社会化服务对农户有机肥施用行为的影响——来自山东省的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;11:1056678. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1056678. eCollection 2023.
3
The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China's Poverty-Stricken Villages.农业补贴政策对食品安全的有效性评估:来自中国贫困村庄的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13797. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113797.
4
Enhancing environmental sustainability in transferred farmlands through rural e-commerce: insights from China.通过农村电子商务提高转移耕地的环境可持续性:来自中国的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(17):25388-25405. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32699-y. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
What Influences Farmers' Adoption of Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Technology in Black Soil Areas? An Empirical Analysis Based on Logistic-ISM Model.什么因素影响了黑土区农民对测土配方施肥技术的采用?基于 Logistic-ISM 模型的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15682. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315682.
6
Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote the Reduction in Chemical Fertilizer? Analysis Based on the Moderating Effect of Farm Size.农业社会化服务能否促进化肥减量?基于农地规模的调节效应分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032323.
7
Are Socialized Services of Agricultural Green Production Conducive to the Reduction in Fertilizer Input? Empirical Evidence from Rural China.农业绿色生产的社会化服务有利于减少化肥投入吗?来自中国农村的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14856. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214856.
8
The impact of agricultural insurance on farmers' income: Guangdong Province (China) as an example.农业保险对农民收入的影响:以广东省(中国)为例。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0274047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274047. eCollection 2022.
9
The impact of agricultural industrial agglomeration on farmers' income: An influence mechanism test based on a spatial panel model.农业产业集聚对农民收入的影响:基于空间面板模型的影响机制检验。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291188. eCollection 2023.
10
Whether the Agricultural Insurance Policy Achieves Green Income Growth-Evidence from the Implementation of China's Total Cost Insurance Pilot Program.农业保险政策能否实现绿色增收——来自中国完全成本保险试点项目实施的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020852.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the impact of anthropogenic activities on land use and land cover changes in the semi-arid and arid regions of Algeria.评估人为活动对阿尔及利亚半干旱和干旱地区土地利用和土地覆盖变化的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Mar 19;196(4):383. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12524-2.
2
Adoption of improved management practices of livestock: Case of small-scale farmers in rural Bangladesh.采用改良的牲畜管理方法:以孟加拉国农村的小规模农户为例。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 25;9(8):e18667. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18667. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Do farmers' risk perception, adaptation strategies, and their determinants benefit towards climate change? Implications for agriculture sector of Punjab, Pakistan.
农民的风险感知、适应策略及其决定因素是否有利于应对气候变化?对巴基斯坦旁遮普省农业部门的启示。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jul;30(33):79861-79882. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27759-8. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
Large-scale farmer-led experiment demonstrates positive impact of cover crops on multiple soil health indicators.大规模由农民主导的实验证明了覆盖作物对多种土壤健康指标有积极影响。
Nat Food. 2021 Feb;2(2):97-103. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00222-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Farmers' response to maize production risks in Cameroon: An application of the criticality risk matrix model.喀麦隆农民对玉米生产风险的应对措施:关键风险矩阵模型的应用
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15124. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
What influences Bangladeshi Boro rice farmers' adoption decisions of recommended fertilizer doses: A case study on Dinajpur district.影响孟加拉国波萝稻农采纳推荐施肥量的因素:以迪纳杰布尔区为例
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 7;17(6):e0269611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269611. eCollection 2022.
7
Research on grain production efficiency in China's main grain producing areas from the perspective of financial support.中国主要粮食产区粮食生产效率的金融支持研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0247610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247610. eCollection 2021.
8
Farm household access to agricultural services in northern Ghana.加纳北部农户获得农业服务的情况。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 18;6(11):e05517. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05517. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Environmental risks among rice farmers and factors influencing their risk perceptions and attitudes in Punjab, Pakistan.巴基斯坦旁遮普邦的水稻种植户面临的环境风险,以及影响他们风险认知和态度的因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):21953-21964. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08771-8. Epub 2020 Apr 13.