Weidlich Anne, Schaser Klaus-Dieter, Weitz Jürgen, Kirchberg Johanna, Fritzmann Johannes, Reeps Christian, Schwabe Philipp, Melcher Ingo, Disch Alexander, Dragu Adrian, Winkler Doreen, Mehnert Elisabeth, Fritzsche Hagen
University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Sarcoma Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, incl. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sarcoma Center at the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;16(13):2334. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132334.
Bone sarcoma or direct pelvic carcinoma invasion of the sacrum represent indications for partial or total sacrectomy. The aim was to describe the oncosurgical management and complication profile and to analyze our own outcome results following sacrectomy.
In a retrospective analysis, 27 patients (n = 8/10/9 sarcoma/chordoma/locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC)) were included. There was total sacrectomy in 9 (incl. combined L5 en bloc spondylectomy in 2), partial in 10 and hemisacrectomy in 8 patients. In 12 patients, resection was navigation-assisted. For reconstruction, an omentoplasty, VRAM-flap or spinopelvic fixation was performed in 20, 10 and 13 patients, respectively.
With a median follow-up (FU) of 15 months, the FU rate was 93%. R0-resection was seen in 81.5% (no significant difference using navigation), and 81.5% of patients suffered from one or more minor-to-moderate complications (especially wound-healing disorders/infection). The median overall survival was 70 months. Local recurrence occurred in 20%, while 44% developed metastases and five patients died of disease.
Resection of sacral tumors is challenging and associated with a high complication profile. Interdisciplinary cooperation with visceral/vascular and plastic surgery is essential. In chordoma patients, systemic tumor control is favorable compared to LRRC and sarcomas. Navigation offers gain in intraoperative orientation, even if there currently seems to be no oncological benefit. Complete surgical resection offers long-term survival to patients undergoing sacrectomy for a variety of complex diseases.
骨肉瘤或盆腔直接侵犯骶骨的癌是部分或全骶骨切除术的指征。目的是描述肿瘤外科治疗及并发症情况,并分析我们自己骶骨切除术后的结果。
进行回顾性分析,纳入27例患者(8例骨肉瘤/10例脊索瘤/9例局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC))。9例患者行全骶骨切除术(其中2例包括L5整块椎体切除术),10例行部分骶骨切除术,8例行半骶骨切除术。12例患者的切除手术采用导航辅助。分别有20例、10例和13例患者进行网膜成形术、腹直肌肌皮瓣转移术或脊柱骨盆固定术进行重建。
中位随访时间为15个月,随访率为93%。81.5%的患者实现R0切除(使用导航无显著差异),81.5%的患者出现一种或多种轻至中度并发症(尤其是伤口愈合障碍/感染)。中位总生存期为70个月。局部复发率为20%,44%发生转移,5例患者死于疾病。
骶骨肿瘤切除具有挑战性,且并发症发生率高。与内脏/血管和整形外科进行多学科合作至关重要。与LRRC和肉瘤相比,脊索瘤患者的全身肿瘤控制情况较好。导航有助于术中定位,即使目前似乎没有肿瘤学益处。对于因各种复杂疾病接受骶骨切除术的患者,完整的手术切除可带来长期生存。