Allesina Anna, Lavacca Antonio, Fop Fabrizio, Giraudi Roberta, Giovinazzo Gloria, Deaglio Silvia, Caorsi Cristiana, Dolla Caterina, Gallo Ester, Mella Alberto, Biancone Luigi
Renal Transplantation Center "A. Vercellone, " Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Città Della Salute e Della Scienza Hospital and Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Immunogenetic and Transplant Biology Center, "Città Della Salute e Della Scienza" Hospital and Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jul;38(7):e15394. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15394.
Broad national or international programs contribute to mitigating the expected longer waiting list (WL) time for sensitized patients but with minor benefits for highly sensitized subjects. Therefore, strategies to prevent high sensitization are urgently required. In this study, we investigated the risk of developing highly sensitized patients with different immunosuppressive (IS) handling after kidney allograft failure (KAF).
Data from 185 patients with KAF, retransplanted/relisted from 2010 to 2020 in two regions of Italy that share the same regional WL, were analyzed. Patients were categorized according to IS management at 12 months after KAF as follows: patients maintaining IS with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (late withdrawal group [LWG], n = 58) and those who withdrew all IS therapy or were on steroids only (early withdrawal group [EWG], n = 127).
Patients in the LWG showed lower panel reactive antibodies (PRA) at 12 (29.0% vs. 85.5%, p < 0.001) and 24 months (61.0% vs. 91.0%, p = 0.001), reduced risk of high sensitization (PRA ≥90%) at 12 (9.4% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001, OR = 0.15) and 24 months (25.6% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.001, OR = 0.26) and almost no very high sensitization (PRA ≥ 98%) at 12 months (1.9% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.003, OR = 0.08) after KAF. In the LWG subgroup analysis, patients who maintained IS for up to 24 months after KAF did not show very high sensitization. The LWG showed shorter active WL times (406 vs. 813 days, p = 0.001) without an increased risk of complications.
CNI maintenance for at least 12 months after KAF could be a useful approach to prevent high sensitization and reduce WL times in patients who are offered retransplantation, without a higher burden of complications.
广泛的国家或国际项目有助于减轻致敏患者预期更长的等待名单(WL)时间,但对高度致敏患者的益处较小。因此,迫切需要预防高度致敏的策略。在本研究中,我们调查了肾移植失败(KAF)后采用不同免疫抑制(IS)处理方式导致患者高度致敏的风险。
分析了2010年至2020年在意大利两个共享相同区域WL的地区重新移植/重新列入名单的185例KAF患者的数据。根据KAF后12个月的IS管理情况将患者分类如下:继续使用钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)进行IS治疗的患者(延迟撤药组[LWG],n = 58)和那些停止所有IS治疗或仅使用类固醇的患者(早期撤药组[EWG],n = 127)。
LWG组患者在12个月时(29.0%对85.5%,p < 0.001)和24个月时(61.0%对91.0%,p = 0.001)的群体反应性抗体(PRA)较低,在12个月时(9.4%对40.7%,p < 0.001,OR = 0.15)和24个月时(25.6%对57.3%,p = 0.001,OR = 0.26)发生高度致敏(PRA≥90%)的风险降低,并且在KAF后12个月时几乎没有非常高度致敏(PRA≥98%)的情况(1.9%对18.6%,p = 0.003,OR = 0.08)。在LWG亚组分析中,KAF后维持IS治疗长达24个月的患者未出现非常高度致敏的情况。LWG组的有效WL时间较短(406天对813天,p = 0.001),且并发症风险没有增加。
KAF后至少维持12个月的CNI治疗可能是一种有用的方法,可预防高度致敏并减少接受再次移植患者的WL时间,且不会增加并发症负担。