Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Sep;75(3):461-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Research has documented that adolescent sleep is impacted by various stressors, including interpersonal experiences and structural disadvantage. This study extends existing knowledge by empirically examining interconnected individual experiences of structural inequity and assessing its association with subjective and objective sleep outcomes.
We utilized data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study to identify seven conceptual domains of structural inequity: perceived discrimination, low school inclusivity, neighborhood safety, unmet medical needs, legal problems, material hardship, and housing insecurity. We operationalized experiences of structural inequity as latent classes, a cumulative exposure, and each domain separately. Sleep disturbances were measured using the Sleep Disturbance Scale, and sleep duration was assessed using Fitbits. Mixed effects linear regression estimated the association between our measures of structural inequity, longitudinal sleep disturbances, and cross-sectional sleep duration.
Latent class analysis revealed common exposure profiles (low risk, interpersonal, and systemic) of experiences of structural inequity across our sample. In longitudinal models, structural inequity was associated with higher Sleep Disturbance Scale scores, whether measured as latent classes, a cumulative exposure, or individual domains. Individuals with interpersonal exposures, those with at least one exposure, and those with legal problems, material hardship, and housing insecurity had lower mean sleep duration.
Results are consistent with literature that frames structural inequity as a lifelong determinant of sleep disturbance and duration. Adolescence represents a crucial time for interventions aimed at improving sleep and redressing inequities throughout the life course; our work can inform the development of policies and interventions toward this end.
研究表明,青少年的睡眠受到各种压力源的影响,包括人际经历和结构性劣势。本研究通过实证检验结构性不平等的相互关联的个体经历,并评估其与主观和客观睡眠结果的关联,扩展了现有知识。
我们利用青少年大脑与认知发展研究的数据,确定了结构性不平等的七个概念领域:感知歧视、低学校包容性、邻里安全、未满足的医疗需求、法律问题、物质困难和住房不安全。我们将结构性不平等的经历操作化为潜在类别、累积暴露和每个领域分别进行衡量。睡眠障碍使用睡眠障碍量表进行测量,睡眠持续时间使用 Fitbit 进行评估。混合效应线性回归估计了我们的结构性不平等测量、纵向睡眠障碍和横断面睡眠持续时间之间的关联。
潜在类别分析揭示了我们样本中结构性不平等经历的共同暴露特征(低风险、人际和系统性)。在纵向模型中,结构性不平等与更高的睡眠障碍量表评分相关,无论测量是作为潜在类别、累积暴露还是个体领域。有人际暴露的个体、至少有一个暴露的个体以及有法律问题、物质困难和住房不安全的个体的平均睡眠时间较短。
结果与将结构性不平等视为睡眠障碍和持续时间的终身决定因素的文献一致。青春期是干预措施改善睡眠和纠正整个生命周期不平等的关键时期;我们的工作可以为为此目的制定政策和干预措施提供信息。