Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Circulate Cardiac and Vascular Centre, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;10(9):2088-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.034. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
There are no randomized data to inform the extent to which transvenous cardiac leads cause tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
This study sought to determine the effect of a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) on TR severity, and secondarily, on right ventricular (RV) size and function.
We evaluated TR severity before and 6 months after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion in a post hoc analysis of adults randomized to receive a transvenous (n = 252) or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) (n = 251) device. TR and RV size and systolic function were assessed by echocardiographic images analyzed in a core laboratory.
At baseline, at least mild TR was present in 30% of individuals. At 6 months, the proportion of participants with any TR in the TV-ICD group was 42% vs 19% in the S-ICD group (P < 0.001). The proportion with moderate or severe TR was 7% in the TV-ICD group vs 2% in the S-ICD group (P = 0.021). At 6 months, the OR of at least 1 grade worsening of TR in the TV-ICD group as compared with the S-ICD group was 7.2 (95% CI: 3.3-15.8; P < 0.001). There were no differences between groups with respect to RV size or systolic function.
Six months following TV-ICD insertion, there was a 7-fold increase in the risk of at least 1 grade worsening of TR, with 7% of individuals having TR that was moderate or severe. There was no detectable difference in RV size or function; however, longer follow-up is needed.
目前尚无随机数据可说明经静脉心脏导线导致三尖瓣反流(TR)的程度。
本研究旨在确定经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器(TV-ICD)对 TR 严重程度的影响,并次要评估其对右心室(RV)大小和功能的影响。
我们对接受经静脉(n=252)或皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器(S-ICD)(n=251)装置的成人进行了一项事后分析,评估了植入式心脏复律除颤器插入前后的 TR 严重程度。TR 和 RV 大小及收缩功能通过心脏超声图像在核心实验室进行分析。
基线时,至少存在轻度 TR 的患者占 30%。6 个月时,TV-ICD 组中存在任何程度 TR 的患者比例为 42%,而 S-ICD 组为 19%(P<0.001)。TR 为中度或重度的患者比例在 TV-ICD 组为 7%,而 S-ICD 组为 2%(P=0.021)。与 S-ICD 组相比,TV-ICD 组 TR 至少恶化 1 级的 OR 为 7.2(95%CI:3.3-15.8;P<0.001)。两组在 RV 大小或收缩功能方面无差异。
TV-ICD 插入后 6 个月,TR 恶化至少 1 级的风险增加了 7 倍,其中 7%的患者 TR 为中度或重度。RV 大小或功能无明显差异;然而,需要更长时间的随访。