• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过结构化的共同决策提高患者对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入的接受度:沟通是关键。

Enhancing patient acceptance of ICD implantation through structured shared decision making: conversation is key.

作者信息

Lambrakos Litsa K, Feigofsky Suzanne A, Wang Ying, Ahmed Fozia Z, Pachón Marta, Takata Theodore S, Frazier-Mills Camille G, Kotschet Emily, Gravelin Laura M, Hsu Jonathan C

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1321 NW 14th Street, Suite 510, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Iowa Heart Center, Carroll, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;67(9):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01850-7. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10840-024-01850-7
PMID:39001909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11711551/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D) are lifesaving treatments for patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Effective physician-patient communication during the shared decision-making process is essential. Electrophysiologist-patient conversations were targeted to obtain objective data on the interaction, understand the conversation framework, and uncover opportunities for improved communication.

METHODS

Individuals previously identified as requiring an ICD/CRT-D but declined implantation were recruited for this four-stage interview and survey-based study. Quantitative analysis of surveys and AI analysis of conversation videos was conducted to evaluate patient participant expectations, analyze feedback about the conversations with study physicians, and gauge willingness for device implantation.

RESULTS

The study included 27 patients (mean age 51 years, 51.9% female) and 9 study physicians. Patients were significantly more willing to undergo ICD/CRT-D implantation after conversing with study physicians compared to their own physicians and pre-conversation surveys (mean scores: 5.0, 3.1, and 4.4 out of 7, respectively; p < 0.001). Patient participants had higher satisfaction with the study conversation, rating study physicians higher in effectiveness of explanations, responsiveness to questions, and overall quality of the conversation compared to their own physicians (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients who previously declined ICD/CRT-D implantation, patient satisfaction and willingness to undergo implantation of a guideline-directed device therapy increased significantly following a structured conversation with study physicians. Identified key elements could be integrated into user-friendly tools and educational materials to facilitate these conversations, improving patient engagement with the decision-making process and enhancing informed acceptance of indicated device therapies.

摘要

背景

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)是对有心脏性猝死风险患者的救命治疗方法。在共同决策过程中有效的医患沟通至关重要。对电生理学家与患者的对话进行针对性研究,以获取关于互动的客观数据,理解对话框架,并发现改善沟通的机会。

方法

招募之前被确定需要植入ICD/CRT-D但拒绝植入的个体参与这项基于四阶段访谈和调查的研究。对调查进行定量分析,并对对话视频进行人工智能分析,以评估患者参与者的期望,分析他们对与研究医生对话的反馈,并衡量其植入设备的意愿。

结果

该研究纳入了27名患者(平均年龄51岁,51.9%为女性)和9名研究医生。与他们自己的医生以及对话前的调查相比,患者在与研究医生交谈后更愿意接受ICD/CRT-D植入(平均得分分别为:7分制下的5.0分、3.1分和4.4分;p<0.001)。与他们自己的医生相比,患者参与者对研究对话的满意度更高,在解释的有效性、对问题的响应能力以及对话的整体质量方面对研究医生的评价更高(所有p<0.001)。

结论

在一组之前拒绝植入ICD/CRT-D的患者中,与研究医生进行结构化对话后,患者的满意度和接受指南指导的设备治疗植入的意愿显著提高。确定的关键要素可整合到用户友好的工具和教育材料中,以促进这些对话,提高患者对决策过程的参与度,并增强对指定设备治疗的知情接受度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/27e9388435f5/10840_2024_1850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/e7ffab31a906/10840_2024_1850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/72c220f1e320/10840_2024_1850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/9546c3ab26f4/10840_2024_1850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/27e9388435f5/10840_2024_1850_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/e7ffab31a906/10840_2024_1850_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/72c220f1e320/10840_2024_1850_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/9546c3ab26f4/10840_2024_1850_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4755/11711551/27e9388435f5/10840_2024_1850_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing patient acceptance of ICD implantation through structured shared decision making: conversation is key.通过结构化的共同决策提高患者对植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)植入的接受度:沟通是关键。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;67(9):2077-2087. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01850-7. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
2
Assisting Black Patients With Decision-Making for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy: Qualitative Findings From the Videos to Reduce Racial Disparities in ICD Therapy via Innovative Designs (VIVID) Trial.协助黑人患者决策植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗:通过创新设计降低 ICD 治疗种族差异的视频减少种族差异试验(VIVID)的定性发现。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jul;17(7):e010550. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010550. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
3
The impact of government-mandated shared decision-making for implantable defibrillators: A natural experiment.政府强制实施的植入式除颤器共同决策的影响:一项自然实验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;45(2):274-280. doi: 10.1111/pace.14414. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
Patient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative study.患者与心脏病专家对植入式心脏复律除颤器决策的看法:一项定性研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1634-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03237.x. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
5
Decision-making regarding primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators among older adults.老年人植入式心脏复律除颤器一级预防的决策。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Feb;43(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/clc.23315. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Results of a physician survey.医生对植入式心脏复律除颤器共同决策的看法:一项医生调查的结果。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;30(11):2420-2426. doi: 10.1111/jce.14178. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Shared Decision-Making About End-of-Life Care Scenarios Compared Among Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients: A National Cohort Study.比较植入式心脏复律除颤器患者之间的生命末期护理方案的共同决策:一项全国队列研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;12(10):e005619. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005619. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
8
Association Between Industry Payments to Physicians and Device Selection in ICD Implantation.医生收受行业款项与 ICD 植入装置选择的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 3;324(17):1755-1764. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17436.
9
Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Among Eligible Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry.在接受植入式心脏复律除颤器的合格患者中使用心脏再同步治疗:来自国家心血管数据注册植入式心脏复律除颤器登记处的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 May 1;2(5):561-565. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5388.
10
Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) patients undergoing device replacement: time to downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-pacemaker? Insights from real-world clinical practice in the DECODE CRT-D analysis.心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)患者更换器械时的适当植入式心律转复除颤器干预:是否需要从 CRT-D 降级为 CRT-起搏器?DECODE CRT-D 分析中的真实临床实践见解。
Europace. 2018 Sep 1;20(9):1475-1483. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux323.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline-directed device therapies in heart failure: A clinical practice-based analysis using electronic health record data.心力衰竭的指南导向性器械治疗:一项基于电子健康记录数据的临床实践分析
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 May 4;16:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100139. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Major gaps in the information provided to patients before implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective patient European evaluation.心脏转复除颤器植入前向患者提供信息的主要差距:前瞻性患者欧洲评估。
Europace. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):1144-1151. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac275.
3
The gap between what patients know and desire to learn about their cardiac implantable electronic devices.
患者对心脏植入式电子设备的了解程度与他们期望学习的内容之间存在差距。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;43(1):118-122. doi: 10.1111/pace.13850. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
Devices in Heart Failure Patients-Who Benefits From ICD and CRT?心力衰竭患者的设备——谁能从植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中获益?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Aug 13;6:111. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00111. eCollection 2019.
5
Use of standardized visual aids improves informed consent for appendectomy in children: A randomized control trial.使用标准化视觉辅助工具可提高小儿阑尾切除术的知情同意书质量:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Surg. 2018 Oct;216(4):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
CRT Survey II: a European Society of Cardiology survey of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in 11 088 patients-who is doing what to whom and how?CRT 调查 II:欧洲心脏病学会对 11088 例心脏再同步治疗患者的调查——谁对谁做了什么以及怎么做的?
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;20(6):1039-1051. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1142. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.2017年心律学会心血管植入式电子装置导线管理与拔除专家共识声明
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):e503-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
9
Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-analysis.非缺血性心肌病患者的一级预防植入型心律转复除颤器:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jun 1;2(6):685-688. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0630.
10
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Mortality in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.植入式心脏复律除颤器用于非缺血性心肌病患者一级预防死亡率的随机对照试验荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jun;28(6):659-665. doi: 10.1111/jce.13204. Epub 2017 Apr 18.