• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯塔基州农村卫生部门实施注射器服务项目的经验教训。

Lessons Learned Implementing Syringe Services Programs at Rural Health Departments in Kentucky.

机构信息

Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):3051-3059. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04389-w. Epub 2024 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10461-024-04389-w
PMID:39001946
Abstract

Until recently, most syringe services programs (SSPs) in the United States operated in metropolitan areas. This study explores how SSP implementers at rural health departments in Kentucky secured support for SSP operations. In late 2020, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 18 people involved with rural SSP implementation in Kentucky. Participants were asked to reflect on their experiences building support for SSP operations among rural health department staff and community members. Participants reported that attitudes and beliefs about SSP implementation among rural health department staff shifted quickly following engagement in educational activities and interaction with SSP clients. Participants explained that successful SSP implementation at rural health departments required sustained educational activities among community members and authorizing authorities. Future work should explore how rural communities may advocate for low-threshold and evidence-based policies that support the provision of harm reduction services.

摘要

直到最近,美国大多数注射器服务项目(SSP)都在大都市区运营。本研究探讨了肯塔基州农村卫生部门的 SSP 实施者如何获得 SSP 运营的支持。在 2020 年底,我们对参与肯塔基州农村 SSP 实施的 18 人进行了深入的半结构化访谈。参与者被要求反思他们在农村卫生部门工作人员和社区成员中建立 SSP 运营支持的经验。参与者报告说,农村卫生部门工作人员对 SSP 实施的态度和信念在参与教育活动和与 SSP 客户互动后迅速转变。参与者解释说,在农村卫生部门成功实施 SSP 需要在社区成员和授权机构中持续开展教育活动。未来的工作应该探讨农村社区如何倡导支持提供减少伤害服务的低门槛和基于证据的政策。

相似文献

1
Lessons Learned Implementing Syringe Services Programs at Rural Health Departments in Kentucky.肯塔基州农村卫生部门实施注射器服务项目的经验教训。
AIDS Behav. 2024 Sep;28(9):3051-3059. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04389-w. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
2
Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on syringe services programs in rural Kentucky.探讨 COVID-19 大流行对肯塔基州农村地区的注射器服务项目的影响。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 May 19;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00631-7.
3
Applications of research evidence during processes to acquire approvals for syringe services program implementation in rural counties in Kentucky.肯塔基州农村县实施注射器服务项目审批过程中研究证据的应用。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):404-412. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2028001.
4
Law enforcement and syringe services program implementation in rural counties in Kentucky: a qualitative exploration.肯塔基州农村县的执法和注射器服务项目实施情况:一项定性探索。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Sep 30;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00684-8.
5
Understanding the public health consequences of suspending a rural syringe services program: a qualitative study of the experiences of people who inject drugs.了解暂停农村注射器服务项目对公共卫生的影响:对注射毒品者的经验进行的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 May 21;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0305-7.
6
Capacity for sustainment of recently established syringe service programs in Appalachian Kentucky: The central role of staff champions.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州新建立的注射器服务项目的持续能力:员工拥护者的核心作用。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 May;41(4):863-872. doi: 10.1111/dar.13436. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Factors that influence enrollment in syringe services programs in rural areas: a qualitative study among program clients in Appalachian Kentucky.影响农村地区注射器服务项目参与的因素:阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州项目参与者的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jun 30;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00518-z.
8
Implementation of Syringe Services Programs to Prevent Rapid Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission in Rural Counties in the United States: A Modeling Study.美国农村县实施注射器服务项目以预防人类免疫缺陷病毒快速传播:一项建模研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 3;70(6):1096-1102. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz321.
9
Motivation to Change and Treatment Participation Among Syringe Service Program Utilizers in Rural Kentucky.肯塔基州农村地区注射器服务项目使用者的改变动机与治疗参与情况
J Rural Health. 2020 Mar;36(2):224-233. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12388. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
10
A qualitative analysis of rural syringe service program fidelity in Appalachian Kentucky: Staff and participant perspectives.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州农村注射器服务项目忠诚度的定性分析:工作人员和参与者的观点。
J Rural Health. 2023 Mar;39(2):328-337. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12715. Epub 2022 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
An Early Implementation Analysis of Syringe Services Programs in Kentucky: Barriers and Facilitators Identified by Program Operators and Local Officials.肯塔基州注射器服务项目的早期实施分析:项目运营者和地方官员确定的障碍和促进因素。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Apr;27(4):1248-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03861-9. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Applications of research evidence during processes to acquire approvals for syringe services program implementation in rural counties in Kentucky.肯塔基州农村县实施注射器服务项目审批过程中研究证据的应用。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):404-412. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2028001.
3
A qualitative study on pharmacy policies toward over-the-counter syringe sales in a rural epicenter of US drug-related epidemics.
一项关于美国毒品相关疫情农村中心药店对非处方注射器销售政策的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jan 8;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00569-2.
4
Healthcare stigma and HIV risk among rural people who inject drugs.农村注射吸毒者中的医疗污名与艾滋病毒风险
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Sep 1;226:108878. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108878. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Factors that influence enrollment in syringe services programs in rural areas: a qualitative study among program clients in Appalachian Kentucky.影响农村地区注射器服务项目参与的因素:阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州项目参与者的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jun 30;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00518-z.
6
Living at the Confluence of Stigmas: PrEP Awareness and Feasibility Among People Who Inject Drugs in Two Predominantly Rural States.生活在污名的交汇处:在两个以农村为主的州,注射吸毒者对 PrEP 的认识和可行性。
AIDS Behav. 2021 Oct;25(10):3085-3096. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03304-x. Epub 2021 May 18.
7
Breaching Trust: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Experiences of People Who Use Drugs in a Rural Setting.违背信任:对农村地区吸毒者医疗保健经历的定性研究
Front Sociol. 2020 Nov 10;5:593925. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.593925. eCollection 2020.
8
HIV and drug related stigma and risk-taking behaviors among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HIV 和与毒品相关的污名与注射吸毒者的冒险行为:系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Addict Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;38(1):71-83. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2020.1718264. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Syringe Service Program Use Among People Who Inject Drugs in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区注射吸毒者对注射器服务项目的使用情况
Am J Public Health. 2020 Jan;110(1):34-36. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305333.
10
Using Interrupted Time Series Analysis to Measure the Impact of Legalized Syringe Exchange on HIV Diagnoses in Baltimore and Philadelphia.运用中断时间序列分析来衡量注射器交换合法化对巴尔的摩和费城艾滋病毒诊断的影响。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Dec 1;82 Suppl 2(2):S148-S154. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002176.