Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program, Cedars-Sinai, 700 N. San Vicente Blvd, Suite G271, West Hollywood, CA, 90069, USA.
Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Sep;69(9):3344-3360. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08543-1. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
Elemental diets have been employed for the management of various diseases for over 50 years, with several mechanisms mediating their beneficial effects. Yet, they are underutilized due to poor palatability, access, cost, and lack of awareness regarding their clinical efficacy. Therefore, in this review, we aimed to systematically search and review the literature to summarize the formulation variability, mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and tolerability of the elemental diets in gastrointestinal diseases. While large prospective trials are lacking, elemental diets appear to exhibit objective and subjective clinical benefit in several diseases, including eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal methanogen overgrowth, chemoradiotherapy-associated mucositis, and celiac disease. Although some data support the long-term use of elemental diets as an add-on supplement for chronic pancreatitis and Crohn's disease, most of the literature on exclusive elemental diets focuses on inducing remission. Therefore, subsequent treatment strategies for maintaining remission need to be adopted in chronic/relapsing diseases. Several mechanistic pathways were identified to mediate the effects of elemental diets, including food additive and allergen-free content, high passive absorption rate, and anti-inflammatory properties. High rates of intolerance up to 40% are seen in the trials where exclusive elemental diets were administered orally due to poor organoleptic acceptability; however, when tolerated, adverse events were rare. Other limitations of elemental diets are cost, access, and lifestyle/social restrictions. Moreover, judicious use is advised in presence of a concomitant restrictive food intake disorders. Elemental diets offer a potentially highly efficacious dietary intervention with minor side effects. Palatability, cost, access, and social restrictions are common barriers of use. Prospective clinical trials are needed to elucidate the role of elemental formulas in the management of individual diseases.
要素饮食作为一种治疗方法,已经在多种疾病的治疗中应用了 50 多年,其多种机制介导了其有益作用。然而,由于口感不佳、获取途径有限、成本高以及对其临床疗效缺乏认识,它们的应用并不广泛。因此,在本综述中,我们旨在系统地搜索和回顾文献,总结胃肠道疾病中要素饮食的配方变化、作用机制、临床应用和耐受性。尽管缺乏大型前瞻性试验,但要素饮食在几种疾病中似乎表现出客观和主观的临床益处,包括嗜酸性食管炎、嗜酸性胃肠炎、炎症性肠病、小肠细菌过度生长、肠道产甲烷菌过度生长、放化疗相关性黏膜炎和乳糜泻。虽然一些数据支持长期使用要素饮食作为慢性胰腺炎和克罗恩病的附加补充治疗,但关于单纯要素饮食的大多数文献都集中在诱导缓解上。因此,在慢性/复发性疾病中需要采用后续的治疗策略来维持缓解。已经确定了几种介导要素饮食作用的机制途径,包括不含食物添加剂和过敏原、高被动吸收率和抗炎特性。由于口感不佳,单纯要素饮食经口给药的试验中高达 40%的患者出现不耐受;然而,当可以耐受时,不良事件很少见。要素饮食的其他限制包括成本、获取途径和生活方式/社会限制。此外,在存在限制食物摄入障碍的情况下建议谨慎使用。要素饮食是一种潜在的高效饮食干预方法,副作用较小。口感不佳、成本、获取途径和社会限制是常见的使用障碍。需要前瞻性临床试验来阐明要素配方在个体疾病治疗中的作用。