Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Dokl Biochem Biophys. 2024 Aug;517(1):235-242. doi: 10.1134/S1607672924700960. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
The objective of this study was to assess the level of antibodies to carbamylated proteins and analyze the clinical and immunological associations in patients with ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive variants of rheumatoid arthritis.
. The study involved 150 patients with a reliable diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and 25 patients as healthy controls. Depending on ACPA values, two groups of patients were recruited: ACPA-positive (n = 75) and ACPA-negative (n = 75). RA activity was assessed by the DAS28 index. Determination of antibodies to carbamylated proteins was performed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (BlueGene Biotech, China). Quantitative determination of ACPA in serum was performed by enzyme immunoassay using a commercial reagent kit (AxisShield, UK; upper limit of normal 5.0 U/mL; Orgentec, Germany; upper limit of normal 20.0 U/mL).
. Median anti-CarP in patients with RA was 126.2 [100.83; 157.41] ng/mL and was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001) than in healthy controls (88.89 [70.53; 107.75] ng/mL). Among all patients with RA, 50 (33.3%) were anti-Carp-positive (22 (29.3%) in the ACPA(+) group and 28 (37.3%) in the ACPA(-) group), and one (2%) volunteer from healthy controls was anti-CarP(+) (p = 0.002). In ROC analysis performed to assess the diagnostic significance of anti-CarP for RA for all patients with RA, the area under the curve was 0.783 ± 0.047 with 95% CI: 0.691-0.874 (p < 0.001), with a cut-off point of 143 ng/mL, specificity 96%, sensitivity 36.7%. In the ACPA(+) RA group, the erosion count was statistically significantly higher (p = 0.044) in anti-CarP(+) patients than in anti-CarP(-) patients. A weak direct correlation between anti-CarP and DAS28 was found in the ACPA(-) RA group.
. We studied the predictive value of anti-CarP as an auxiliary biomarker in ACPA(+) and ACPA(-) subtypes of RA. ACPA(+) anti-CarP(+) patients have a more "erosive" subtype of the disease than ACPA(+) anti-CarP(-) patients. In ACPA(-) patients, anti-CarP helps to identify a more erosive subtype of the disease, and among ACPA(-) patients it helps to reduce the proportion of seronegative patients. Further studies are required to determine the optimal standards for the laboratory diagnosis of anti-CarP and to clarify the diagnostic potential of these ABs as part of the differential diagnosis of arthritis in other rheumatic diseases.
评估抗氨甲酰化蛋白抗体的水平,并分析抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性和阳性变异型类风湿关节炎患者的临床和免疫学相关性。
纳入 150 例确诊为类风湿关节炎的患者和 25 例健康对照者。根据抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体值将患者分为两组:抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性组(n=75)和抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性组(n=75)。采用 DAS28 指数评估 RA 活动度。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(中国 BlueGene Biotech)测定抗氨甲酰化蛋白抗体。采用酶免疫分析法(英国 AxisShield,正常值上限 5.0 U/mL;德国 Orgentec,正常值上限 20.0 U/mL)检测血清中抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体的定量。
类风湿关节炎患者的中位抗-CarP 为 126.2 [100.83;157.41]ng/ml,显著高于健康对照组(88.89 [70.53;107.75]ng/ml,p<0.001)。在所有类风湿关节炎患者中,50 例(33.3%)为抗-Carp 阳性(抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性组 22 例[29.3%],抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性组 28 例[37.3%]),1 例(2%)健康对照者为抗-CarP 阳性(p=0.002)。对所有类风湿关节炎患者进行抗-CarP 诊断类风湿关节炎的诊断意义的 ROC 分析,曲线下面积为 0.783±0.047(95%CI:0.691-0.874,p<0.001),截断值为 143ng/ml,特异性 96%,灵敏度 36.7%。在抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性类风湿关节炎患者中,抗-CarP 阳性患者的侵蚀计数显著高于抗-CarP 阴性患者(p=0.044)。在抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性类风湿关节炎患者中,抗-CarP 与 DAS28 之间存在弱直接相关性。
我们研究了抗-CarP 作为抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性和阴性变异型类风湿关节炎辅助生物标志物的预测价值。抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性抗-CarP 阳性患者的疾病亚型比抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性抗-CarP 阴性患者更具“侵蚀性”。在抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性患者中,抗-CarP 有助于识别更具侵蚀性的疾病亚型,在抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阴性患者中,它有助于降低血清阴性患者的比例。需要进一步研究来确定抗-CarP 实验室诊断的最佳标准,并阐明这些 AB 在其他风湿性疾病的关节炎鉴别诊断中的诊断潜力。