Department of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.
Royal Free Clinical Research Facility, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 13;14(7):e080619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080619.
To investigate the views, hopes and concerns of patients living with glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) regarding vision home-monitoring.
Qualitative study using focus groups and questionnaires. Participants were given three disease-relevant home-monitoring tests to try. The tests consisted of three visual field tests for the glaucoma groups (Melbourne Rapid Fields, Eyecatcher, Visual Fields Fast) and three acuity and/or contrast-sensitivity tests for AMD groups (Alleye, PopCSF, SpotChecks). Focus group data were thematically analysed.
University meeting rooms in London, UK.
Eight people with glaucoma (five women, median age 74) and seven people with AMD (four women, median age 77) volunteered through two UK-based charities. Participants were excluded if they did not self-report a diagnosis of glaucoma or AMD or if they lived further than a 1-hour travel distance from the university (to ensure minimal travel burden on participants).
Six themes emerged from focus groups, the two most frequently referenced being: 'concerns about home-monitoring' and 'patient and practitioner access to results'. Overall, participants believed home-monitoring could provide patients with a greater sense of control, but also expressed concerns, including: the possibility of home-monitoring replacing face-to-face appointments; the burden placed on clinicians by the need to process additional data; struggles to keep up with requisite technologies; and potential anxiety from seeing worrying results. Most devices were scored highly for usability, though several practical improvements were suggested.
Patients with mild-to-moderate glaucoma/AMD expect vision home-monitoring to be beneficial, but have significant concerns about its potential implementation.
调查青光眼和年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者对视力家庭监测的看法、希望和担忧。
使用焦点小组和问卷调查的定性研究。参与者被给予三种与疾病相关的家庭监测测试进行尝试。这些测试包括三种青光眼组的视野测试(墨尔本快速视野、Eyecatcher、快速视野)和三种 AMD 组的视力和/或对比敏感度测试(Alleye、PopCSF、SpotChecks)。对焦点小组数据进行主题分析。
英国伦敦的大学会议室。
通过两个英国慈善机构自愿参加的 8 名青光眼患者(5 名女性,中位年龄 74 岁)和 7 名 AMD 患者(4 名女性,中位年龄 77 岁)。如果他们没有自我报告青光眼或 AMD 的诊断,或者他们居住的地方距离大学超过 1 小时的车程(以确保参与者的旅行负担最小),则将其排除在外。
焦点小组出现了六个主题,其中两个最常被提及的是:“对家庭监测的担忧”和“患者和医生对结果的访问”。总体而言,参与者认为家庭监测可以为患者提供更大的控制感,但也表达了担忧,包括:家庭监测可能会取代面对面的预约;临床医生需要处理额外数据的负担;难以跟上所需技术的步伐;以及看到令人担忧的结果可能会引起潜在的焦虑。虽然对一些实用改进提出了建议,但大多数设备在可用性方面得分都很高。
轻度至中度青光眼/AMD 患者期望视力家庭监测有益,但对其潜在实施存在重大担忧。