Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Nov;38(11):2567-2575. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.04.047. Epub 2024 May 6.
To determine if the intraoperative transfusion requirements differ based on the mechanical circulatory device used as a bridge to heart transplantation.
A single-center retrospective analysis of intraoperative transfusion requirements in all patients undergoing heart or heart/kidney transplantation between November 2018 and July 2021 who were bridged with a temporary (Impella 5.5) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
A tertiary care hospital.
Forty-three adult patients bridged to heart or heart/kidney transplantation with a temporary or durable LVAD between 2018 and 2021 INTERVENTIONS: Recording of baseline characteristics and intraoperative transfusion requirements, including packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, autologous blood salvage, and platelets. The difference in cardiopulmonary bypass times, intensive care unit length of stay, and the vasoactive inotrope score following transplantation were also recorded.
The primary outcome was the volume of blood products transfused intraoperatively. Patients who underwent bridge to transplantation using the Impella 5.5 had statistically significant lower median transfusions of cryoprecipitate (155 mL versus 200 mL, p = 0.015), autologous blood salvage (675 mL versus 1,125 mL, p ≤ 0.01), and platelets (412 mL versus 675 mL, p ≤ 0.01). Additionally, there was a trend toward lower transfusion of intraoperative packed red blood cells (4.5 units versus 6.5 units, p = 0.29) and fresh frozen plasma (675 mL versus 800 mL, p = 0.11), but these were not statistically significant.
The results suggest a reduction in certain intraoperative transfusion requirements in patients undergoing heart transplantation bridged with the Impella 5.5 versus durable left ventricular assist device.
确定作为心脏移植桥接的机械循环装置的使用是否会导致术中输血需求的差异。
对 2018 年 11 月至 2021 年 7 月期间因心脏或心脏/肾脏移植而使用临时(Impella 5.5)或耐用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)桥接的所有患者的术中输血需求进行单中心回顾性分析。
三级保健医院。
43 名成人患者,2018 年至 2021 年期间因心脏或心脏/肾脏移植而使用临时或耐用 LVAD 桥接。
记录基线特征和术中输血需求,包括浓缩红细胞、新鲜冷冻血浆、冷沉淀、自体血液回收和血小板。还记录了移植后体外循环时间、重症监护病房住院时间和血管活性正性肌力药物评分的差异。
主要结局是术中输血量。使用 Impella 5.5 桥接进行移植的患者,冷沉淀(155 mL 与 200 mL,p = 0.015)、自体血液回收(675 mL 与 1,125 mL,p ≤ 0.01)和血小板(412 mL 与 675 mL,p ≤ 0.01)的中位数输注量有统计学显著差异。此外,术中浓缩红细胞(4.5 单位与 6.5 单位,p = 0.29)和新鲜冷冻血浆(675 mL 与 800 mL,p = 0.11)的输注量也有下降趋势,但无统计学意义。
结果表明,与耐用左心室辅助装置相比,使用 Impella 5.5 桥接的心脏移植患者的某些术中输血需求减少。