Suppr超能文献

比较主题统觉测验(TAT)与一种新的图片投射测验的诊断效度。

Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test.

作者信息

Sharkey K J, Ritzler B A

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1985 Aug;49(4):406-12. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4904_8.

Abstract

Diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test, the PPT, were compared for normal, depressed, and psychotic subjects. Generally, the PPT elicited more positive emotional tone, more activity, and fewer thematic deviations than the TAT. The PPT and TAT were essentially equal in the capacity to discriminate between stories of normal and depressed subjects; however, the PPT was superior in differentiating psychotics from normals and depressives. On the PPT, depressives told stories with gloomier emotional tone and psychotics made more perceptual distortions, thematic and interpretive deviations. None of these differences were apparent on the TAT. The PPT pictures seem to have more diagnostic validity than the TAT stimuli.

摘要

对正常、抑郁和精神病患者,比较了主题统觉测验(TAT)和一种新的图片投射测验——图片投射测验(PPT)的诊断效度。总体而言,与TAT相比,PPT引发的积极情绪基调更多、活动更多,且主题偏差更少。在区分正常和抑郁受试者的故事方面,PPT和TAT的能力基本相当;然而,在区分精神病患者与正常人和抑郁症患者方面,PPT更具优势。在PPT上,抑郁症患者讲述的故事情绪基调更灰暗,精神病患者出现更多的感知扭曲、主题和解释偏差。这些差异在TAT上均不明显。PPT图片似乎比TAT刺激物具有更高的诊断效度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验