Suppr超能文献

基于社区的保护模式对保护大型食草动物种群的贡献。

The contribution of community-based conservation models to conserving large herbivore populations.

机构信息

Junior Research Group Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.

The School for Field Studies, Centre For Wildlife Management Studies, PO Box 304, Karatu, Tanzania.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 13;14(1):16221. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66517-9.

Abstract

In East Africa, community-based conservation models (CBCMs) have been established to support the conservation of wildlife in fragmented landscapes like the Tarangire Ecosystem, Tanzania. To assess how different management approaches maintained large herbivore populations, we conducted line distance surveys and estimated seasonal densities of elephant, giraffe, zebra, and wildebeest in six management units, including three CBCMs, two national parks (positive controls), and one area with little conservation interventions (negative control). Using a Monte-Carlo approach to propagate uncertainties from the density estimates and trend analysis, we analyzed the resulting time series (2011-2019). Densities of the target species were consistently low in the site with little conservation interventions. In contrast, densities of zebra and wildebeest in CBCMs were similar to national parks, providing evidence that CBCMs contributed to the stabilization of these migratory populations in the central part of the ecosystem. CBCMs also supported giraffe and elephant densities similar to those found in national parks. In contrast, the functional connectivity of Lake Manyara National Park has not been augmented by CBCMs. Our analysis suggests that CBCMs can effectively conserve large herbivores, and that maintaining connectivity through CBCMs should be prioritized.

摘要

在东非,建立了基于社区的保护模式(CBCMs),以支持坦桑尼亚塔兰吉雷生态系统等破碎景观中的野生动物保护。为了评估不同的管理方法如何维持大型食草动物的数量,我们在六个管理单元(包括三个 CBCMs、两个国家公园(阳性对照)和一个几乎没有保护干预的区域(阴性对照))进行了线路距离调查,并估计了大象、长颈鹿、斑马和角马的季节密度。我们使用蒙特卡罗方法来传播密度估计和趋势分析中的不确定性,然后分析了由此产生的时间序列(2011-2019 年)。在几乎没有保护干预的地点,目标物种的密度一直很低。相比之下,CBCMs 中的斑马和角马的密度与国家公园相似,这表明 CBCMs 有助于稳定这些迁徙种群在生态系统中部的数量。CBCMs 还支持与国家公园相似的长颈鹿和大象密度。相比之下,塔兰吉雷国家公园的功能连通性并没有因 CBCMs 而增强。我们的分析表明,CBCMs 可以有效地保护大型食草动物,并且应该优先考虑通过 CBCMs 维持连通性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/205e/11246445/66862278c240/41598_2024_66517_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验