Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Nov;107(11):9558-9571. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-24593. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
A customized voluntary waiting period (VWP) before first insemination was tested in 18 commercial dairy herds in Sweden to assess milk production, fertility, and health in primiparous cows expected to be suited for extended VWP. Cow selection for extended VWP was based on 3 criteria in early lactation: (1) the 10% of cows with highest genomic persistency index, (2) cows with a difficult calving or disease during the first month of lactation, and (3) cows with higher yield during d 4 to 33 after calving than the herd average for primiparous cows. Cows meeting at least one of these criteria were randomly assigned to either treatment with an extended VWP of at least 175 d (ExtExt; n = 174, calving interval [CInt] = 16.3 mo) or treatment with a conventional VWP of a maximum of 100 d; (ExtConv; n = 173, CInt = 12.4 mo). Cows not meeting any of the criteria were assigned to the conventional VWP treatment (ConvConv; n = 183, CInt = 12.0 mo). We found no differences in milk yield per day in the CInt between treatments, although 305-d and whole-lactation (WL) milk yields were higher for ExtExt cows (10,371 and 13,803 kg) than ExtConv cows (9,812 and 10,257 kg). Milk yield at the last test milking before dry-off was lower in ExtExt compared with ExtConv cows (24.9 vs. 28.3 kg), but the results showed no difference in dry period length between the treatments. Regarding reproductive performance, the ExtExt cows had a higher first service conception rate (FSCR; 60% vs. 45%) and lower number of inseminations per conception (NINS; 1.67 vs. 2.19), compared with the ExtConv cows. As expected, ConvConv cows had the lowest milk yield (305-d, WL, and per day) in the CInt; however, FSCR and NINS did not differ between ConvConv cows and cows in the other 2 VWP treatments. Disease incidence was higher for cows in the ExtConv compared with the ConvConv treatment, but there was no difference between ExtExt and the 2 other VWP treatments. Further, no difference in the proportion of cows with good udder health or culling rate was detected between any of the treatments, though due to low prevalence, the study lacked power to draw major conclusions on these results. Thus, prolonging VWP for suitable primiparous cows can produce benefits such as improved fertility in the form of higher FSCR and lower NINS, as well as lower dry-off yield, without compromising milk yield or prolonging dry period length.
在瑞典的 18 个商业奶牛场测试了一种定制的自愿等待期(VWP),以评估预期适合延长 VWP 的初产奶牛的产奶量、生育能力和健康状况。延长 VWP 的奶牛选择基于泌乳早期的 3 个标准:(1)基因组持久性指数最高的 10%奶牛,(2)在泌乳第一个月有难产或疾病的奶牛,(3)产后第 4 天至第 33 天产奶量高于初产奶牛群平均值的奶牛。符合至少一个标准的奶牛被随机分配到延长 VWP 至少 175 天的处理组(ExtExt;n = 174,产犊间隔[CInt] = 16.3 个月)或延长 VWP 最多 100 天的处理组(ExtConv;n = 173,CInt = 12.4 mo)。不符合任何标准的奶牛被分配到常规 VWP 处理组(ConvConv;n = 183,CInt = 12.0 mo)。我们发现处理组之间的 CInt 内的日奶产量没有差异,尽管 ExtExt 奶牛的 305 天和整个泌乳期(WL)产奶量(10371 和 13803 千克)高于 ExtConv 奶牛(9812 和 10257 千克)。与 ExtConv 奶牛相比,ExtExt 奶牛在干奶前的最后一次挤奶时的产奶量较低(24.9 对 28.3 千克),但处理组之间的干奶期长度没有差异。关于繁殖性能,ExtExt 奶牛的首次配种受胎率(FSCR;60%对 45%)更高,每配种受胎次数(NINS;1.67 对 2.19)更低,与 ExtConv 奶牛相比。不出所料,ConvConv 奶牛在 CInt 内的产奶量(305 天、WL 和每天)最低;然而,FSCR 和 NINS 之间在 ConvConv 奶牛和其他 2 个 VWP 处理组的奶牛之间没有差异。与 ConvConv 处理相比,ExtConv 处理的奶牛疾病发病率更高,但 ExtExt 与其他 2 个 VWP 处理之间没有差异。此外,在任何处理组之间,都没有检测到具有良好乳房健康或淘汰率的奶牛比例有差异,尽管由于发病率低,研究缺乏对这些结果的主要结论的能力。因此,延长适合的初产奶牛的 VWP 可以带来一些好处,例如通过更高的 FSCR 和更低的 NINS 提高生育能力,以及降低干奶产量,而不会降低产奶量或延长干奶期。