Spinal Accessory to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer in Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Comparative Study of Shoulder Recovery Outcomes in the Anterior versus Posterior Approach and Surgeons' Preference.

BACKGROUND

Conventionally, neural transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injury is performed via the anterior approach. However, important advantages of the posterior approach have made it an alternative option, such as the proximity of neural coaptation to the muscle to be reinnervated and negating the effects of a second injury to the suprascapular nerve.

METHODS

Retrospective data was collected from 30 patients with brachial plexus injury who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer over 4 years. There were 15 patients in the anterior-approach group (group A) and 15 in the posterior-approach group (group B). Functional outcome at the shoulder was measured as muscle power and active range of motion at 18 months, and data on patients' satisfaction levels and surgeons' perceptions was also collected.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was found in the muscle strength achieved in the 2 groups (P = 0.34), but significant recovery was found in the external rotation achieved by group B (P = 0.02). Statistical difference was insignificant in the 2 groups' active range of motion during abduction and external rotation. The satisfaction index of patients was 86.7% in group B as compared to 68% in group A. Surgeons' perspective showed a faster speed of suprascapular nerve exploration in the posterior approach, with better visibility of supraspinatus muscle contraction, and overall surgeons preferred the posterior approach.

CONCLUSIONS

External rotation at the shoulder is better via the posterior approach, but no difference in abduction was noted. Patients who underwent the posterior approach were more satisfied with the recovery, and surgeons preferred the posterior approach.