Suppr超能文献

理解法医学中的“误差”:入门指南。

Understanding 'error' in the forensic sciences: A primer.

作者信息

Martire Kristy A, Chin Jason M, Davis Carolyn, Edmond Gary, Growns Bethany, Gorski Stacey, Kemp Richard I, Lee Zara, Verdon Christopher M, Jansen Gabrielle, Lang Tanya, Neal Tess M S, Searston Rachel A, Slocum Joshua, Summersby Stephanie, Tangen Jason M, Thompson Matthew B, Towler Alice, Watson Darren, Werrett Melissa V, Younan Mariam, Ballantyne Kaye N

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia.

College of Law, ANU, Australia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 29;8:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This paper distils seven key lessons about 'error' from a collaborative webinar series between practitioners at Victoria Police Forensic Services Department and academics. It aims to provide the common understanding of error necessary to foster interdisciplinary dialogue, collaboration and research. The lessons underscore the inevitability, complexity and subjectivity of error, as well as opportunities for learning and growth. Ultimately, we argue that error can be a potent tool for continuous improvement and accountability, enhancing the reliability of forensic sciences and public trust. It is hoped the shared understanding provided by this paper will support future initiatives and funding for collaborative developments in this vital domain.

摘要

本文提炼了维多利亚警方法医服务部的从业者与学者之间合作举办的网络研讨会系列中关于“错误”的七个关键经验教训。其目的是提供对错误的共同理解,这对于促进跨学科对话、合作和研究是必要的。这些经验教训强调了错误的必然性、复杂性和主观性,以及学习和成长的机会。最终,我们认为错误可以成为持续改进和问责的有力工具,提高法医学的可靠性和公众信任度。希望本文提供的共同理解将支持这一重要领域未来的合作发展倡议和资金投入。

相似文献

1
Understanding 'error' in the forensic sciences: A primer.理解法医学中的“误差”:入门指南。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 29;8:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470. eCollection 2024.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
[The logical analysis of the notion of 'medical error'].['医疗差错概念的逻辑分析']
Sud Med Ekspert. 2018;61(3):49-53. doi: 10.17116/sudmed2018613-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparency and diversity to advance legal-scientific communication.以透明度和多样性促进法律与科学交流。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Sep 21;9:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100557. eCollection 2024.
2
A plan for systematic reviews for high-need areas in forensic science.法医学高需求领域系统评价计划。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Aug 31;9:100542. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100542. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The scientific reinvention of forensic science.法医学的科学重塑。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301840120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301840120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development.朝着法医学研究与开发的更高相关性迈进。
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Jul;348:111592. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111592. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
6
Stressors in forensic organizations: Risks and solutions.法医机构中的压力源:风险与解决方案。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Dec 20;4:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100198. eCollection 2022.
7
The benefits of errors during training.训练过程中错误的益处。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Dec 20;4:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100207. eCollection 2022.
8
The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science.法医学中可区分性与可靠性之间的区别。
Sci Justice. 2021 Jul;61(4):319-331. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验