• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解法医学中的“误差”:入门指南。

Understanding 'error' in the forensic sciences: A primer.

作者信息

Martire Kristy A, Chin Jason M, Davis Carolyn, Edmond Gary, Growns Bethany, Gorski Stacey, Kemp Richard I, Lee Zara, Verdon Christopher M, Jansen Gabrielle, Lang Tanya, Neal Tess M S, Searston Rachel A, Slocum Joshua, Summersby Stephanie, Tangen Jason M, Thompson Matthew B, Towler Alice, Watson Darren, Werrett Melissa V, Younan Mariam, Ballantyne Kaye N

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia.

College of Law, ANU, Australia.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 29;8:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470
PMID:39005839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240290/
Abstract

This paper distils seven key lessons about 'error' from a collaborative webinar series between practitioners at Victoria Police Forensic Services Department and academics. It aims to provide the common understanding of error necessary to foster interdisciplinary dialogue, collaboration and research. The lessons underscore the inevitability, complexity and subjectivity of error, as well as opportunities for learning and growth. Ultimately, we argue that error can be a potent tool for continuous improvement and accountability, enhancing the reliability of forensic sciences and public trust. It is hoped the shared understanding provided by this paper will support future initiatives and funding for collaborative developments in this vital domain.

摘要

本文提炼了维多利亚警方法医服务部的从业者与学者之间合作举办的网络研讨会系列中关于“错误”的七个关键经验教训。其目的是提供对错误的共同理解,这对于促进跨学科对话、合作和研究是必要的。这些经验教训强调了错误的必然性、复杂性和主观性,以及学习和成长的机会。最终,我们认为错误可以成为持续改进和问责的有力工具,提高法医学的可靠性和公众信任度。希望本文提供的共同理解将支持这一重要领域未来的合作发展倡议和资金投入。

相似文献

1
Understanding 'error' in the forensic sciences: A primer.理解法医学中的“误差”:入门指南。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Apr 29;8:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100470. eCollection 2024.
2
A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement.法医学中错误、偏差及解释的视角与持续进步的方向
J Forensic Sci. 2009 Jul;54(4):798-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01081.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
3
Optimising engagement between forensics & policing: Avoiding the dialogue of the deaf.优化法证与警务之间的协作:避免自说自话。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Apr;321:110605. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110605. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations.打破司法壁垒:梳理法医学、法医病理学及相关健康专业在成人性侵犯调查中的角色与专业知识流程
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Apr;285:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Forensic facial approximation: an overview of current methods used at the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine/Victoria Police Criminal Identification Squad.法医面部复原:维多利亚法医研究所/维多利亚警方刑事鉴定组当前使用方法概述
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2005 Dec;23(2):45-50.
7
The forensic examination of structural fires in Victoria, Australia: Decision-making processes and impact on judicial outcomes.澳大利亚维多利亚州结构性火灾的法医检验:决策过程及其对司法结果的影响。
Sci Justice. 2021 Jul;61(4):369-377. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.03.009. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Collaborative governance at the start of an integrated community approach: a case study.协同治理在综合社区方法启动时的应用:一个案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 19;22(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13354-y.
9
[The logical analysis of the notion of 'medical error'].['医疗差错概念的逻辑分析']
Sud Med Ekspert. 2018;61(3):49-53. doi: 10.17116/sudmed2018613-53.
10
Near miss incidents in police custody suites in London in 2003: a feasibility study.2003年伦敦警察拘留所的未遂事件:一项可行性研究。
J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.004. Epub 2005 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Transparency and diversity to advance legal-scientific communication.以透明度和多样性促进法律与科学交流。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Sep 21;9:100557. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100557. eCollection 2024.
2
A plan for systematic reviews for high-need areas in forensic science.法医学高需求领域系统评价计划。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Aug 31;9:100542. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100542. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The scientific reinvention of forensic science.法医学的科学重塑。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301840120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301840120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Management and disclosure of quality issues in forensic science: A survey of current practice in Australia and New Zealand.法医学中质量问题的管理与披露:澳大利亚和新西兰当前实践调查
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jun 15;7:100339. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100339. eCollection 2023.
3
Towards more relevance in forensic science research and development.朝着法医学研究与开发的更高相关性迈进。
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Jul;348:111592. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111592. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Partnership between academics and practitioners - Addressing the challenges in forensic science.学术界与从业者之间的合作——应对法医学中的挑战。
Sci Justice. 2023 Jan;63(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
5
Inconclusives, errors, and error rates in forensic firearms analysis:Three statistical perspectives.法医枪支分析中的不确定结果、误差及错误率:三种统计学视角
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Jun 8;5:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100273. eCollection 2022.
6
Stressors in forensic organizations: Risks and solutions.法医机构中的压力源:风险与解决方案。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Dec 20;4:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100198. eCollection 2022.
7
The benefits of errors during training.训练过程中错误的益处。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Dec 20;4:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100207. eCollection 2022.
8
The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science.法医学中可区分性与可靠性之间的区别。
Sci Justice. 2021 Jul;61(4):319-331. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
9
Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts.法医学血迹形态分析师结论的准确性和可重复性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2021 Aug;325:110856. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110856. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
10
HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.可疑的研究行为:回溯性选择偏倚、选择性报告偏倚、P 值操纵、钓鱼式研究、数据挖掘和数据打捞。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 18;82(1):20f13804. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13804.