Suppr超能文献

使用长脉冲热成像和剪切散斑干涉术检测复合材料结构中的缺陷。

Inspection of defects in composite structures using long pulse thermography and shearography.

作者信息

Wei Yanjie, Xiao Yao, Gu Xiaohui, Ren Jianying, Zhang Yu, Zhang Dongsheng, Chen Yanhong, Li Haiyan, Li Shaohua

机构信息

Department of Engineering Mechanics, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, 050043, China.

Hebei Research Center of the Basic Discipline Engineering Mechanics, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, 050043, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jun 17;10(12):e33184. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33184. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.

Abstract

Long pulse thermography (LPT) and shearography have been developed as primary methods for detecting debonding or delamination defects in composites due to their full-field imaging, non-contact operation, and high detection efficiency. Both methods utilize halogen lamps as the excitation source for thermal loading. However, the defects detected by the two techniques differ due to their distinct inspection mechanisms. In this study, LPT and shearography are employed to evaluate internal damage in various composite structures. The experimental results demonstrate that LPT, when combined with thermal signal processing algorithms, can clearly detect debonding defects in rubber-to-metal bonded plates, whereas excessive adhesive defects can only be identified by shearography. Flat-bottom holes in the CFRP panel can only be detected by LPT, and shearography is particularly effective for detecting composite materials with a metal skin. For the quantitative measurement of defect sizes, the average errors of the rubber-to-metal bonded plate and CFRP panel using LPT are 4.9 % and 2.2 %, respectively, whereas the average errors of the rubber-to-metal bonded plate and aluminum honeycomb panel using shearography are 15.12 % and 95.4 %, respectively. This indicates that LPT is superior to shearography in quantitatively measuring defect sizes. These two nondestructive testing methods, based on different principles, each have their own advantages and disadvantages. Employing a multi-modal inspection method can leverage their complementary advantages, preventing misdetection and leakage of internal defects in composites.

摘要

长脉冲热成像(LPT)和剪切ography已被开发为检测复合材料中脱粘或分层缺陷的主要方法,因为它们具有全场成像、非接触操作和高检测效率。这两种方法都使用卤素灯作为热加载的激发源。然而,由于它们不同的检测机制,两种技术检测到的缺陷有所不同。在本研究中,LPT和剪切ography被用于评估各种复合结构的内部损伤。实验结果表明,LPT与热信号处理算法相结合时,可以清晰地检测橡胶与金属粘结板中的脱粘缺陷,而过多的粘结缺陷只能通过剪切ography识别。CFRP面板中的平底孔只能通过LPT检测到,而剪切ography对于检测具有金属蒙皮的复合材料特别有效。对于缺陷尺寸的定量测量,使用LPT的橡胶与金属粘结板和CFRP面板的平均误差分别为4.9%和2.2%,而使用剪切ography的橡胶与金属粘结板和铝蜂窝板的平均误差分别为15.12%和95.4%。这表明LPT在缺陷尺寸的定量测量方面优于剪切ography。这两种基于不同原理的无损检测方法各有优缺点。采用多模态检测方法可以利用它们的互补优势,防止复合材料内部缺陷的误检测和漏检。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1be4/11239696/e32ac723d05b/gr1.jpg

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验