Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Xijing Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, People's Republic of China.
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 Jul 8;18:2837-2845. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S451089. eCollection 2024.
To investigate the effects of nalbuphine on emergency agitation (EA), which affects up to 80% of the children following otolaryngology procedures, in children undergoing cochlear implantation.
A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 2020 and October 2022. Eligible children, aged 6 months to 3 years old, were randomly assigned to either 0.1 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine or 0.9% saline groups. EA was defined by the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score ≥10. Extubation time, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay, severe EA (PAED ≥ 15), peak PAED score, the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale, Ramsay sedation score, and adverse events were also recorded.
A total of 104 children were enrolled, with 26 children in each group. Nalbuphine significantly reduced the EA occurrence from 73.1% in the saline group to 38.5%, 30.8%, and 26.9% in the 0.1 mg/kg, 0.15 mg/kg, and 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine groups, respectively ( < 0.001), without affecting the extubation time and PACU length of stay. More children (34.6%) in the 0.9% saline group experienced severe EA. Higher dose nalbuphine (0.15 mg/kg, 0.2 mg/kg) showed lower peak PAED score, better analgesia and sedation effect compared with 0.1 mg/kg nalbuphine and saline groups. However, 0.2mg/kg nalbuphine caused undesired over-sedation in two (7.7%) children. No other adverse events were reported.
Young children undergoing cochlear implantation surgery were at a high risk of EA and postoperative pain, while 0.2 mg/kg nalbuphine might be an ideal candidate for EA and pain prevention when used under close monitoring.
ChiCTR2000040407.
本研究旨在探讨纳布啡对行耳蜗植入术儿童术后躁动(EA)的影响,EA 可影响多达 80%的耳鼻喉科术后患儿。
这是一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照临床试验,于 2020 年 11 月至 2022 年 10 月进行。纳入年龄 6 个月至 3 岁的患儿,随机分为 0.1mg/kg、0.15mg/kg、0.2mg/kg 纳布啡组或 0.9%生理盐水组。EA 定义为儿科麻醉苏醒期躁动(PAED)评分≥10 分。记录拔管时间、麻醉后监护室(PACU)停留时间、严重 EA(PAED≥15 分)、PAED 评分峰值、面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰(FLACC)评分、拉姆齐镇静评分以及不良事件。
共纳入 104 例患儿,每组 26 例。与生理盐水组 73.1%的 EA 发生率相比,0.1mg/kg、0.15mg/kg 和 0.2mg/kg 纳布啡组的 EA 发生率分别显著降低至 38.5%、30.8%和 26.9%(<0.001),但不影响拔管时间和 PACU 停留时间。0.9%生理盐水组更多患儿(34.6%)发生严重 EA。与 0.1mg/kg 纳布啡和生理盐水组相比,高剂量纳布啡(0.15mg/kg、0.2mg/kg)可降低 PAED 评分峰值,具有更好的镇痛和镇静效果。然而,0.2mg/kg 纳布啡引起 2 例(7.7%)患儿出现不期望的过度镇静。未报告其他不良事件。
行耳蜗植入术的儿童发生 EA 和术后疼痛的风险较高,而 0.2mg/kg 纳布啡在密切监测下可能是 EA 和预防疼痛的理想选择。
ChiCTR2000040407。