• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investigating optimal compression approach following radial artery puncture: a retrospective study.桡动脉穿刺后最佳压迫方法的研究:一项回顾性研究
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.62347/BWUP6404. eCollection 2024.
2
Manual Versus Mechanical Compression of the Radial Artery After Transradial Coronary Angiography: The MEMORY Multicenter Randomized Trial.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影后桡动脉手动与机械压迫:MEMORY 多中心随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 11;11(11):1050-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.042.
3
Access site complications and puncture site pain following transradial coronary procedures: a correlational study.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后穿刺部位疼痛及相关并发症的相关性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Oct;50(10):1304-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.023. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
4
A comparison of 2 devices for radial artery hemostasis after transradial coronary intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后两种桡动脉止血装置的比较。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):192-6. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000115.
5
Distal Transradial Artery Access for Neuroangiography and Neurointerventions : Pitfalls and Exploring the Boundaries.经桡动脉远端入路在神经血管造影和神经介入中的应用:陷阱和边界探索。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Jun;32(2):427-434. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01039-9. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
6
Efficacy and Safety of Distal Radial Artery Approach for Coronary Angiography: A Retrospective Study.经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影术的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Heart Surg Forum. 2023 Oct 25;26(5):E577-E583. doi: 10.59958/hsf.5887.
7
Is radial artery occlusion and local vascular complications following transradial coronary procedures affected by the type of haemostasis device used? A non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial (RadCom trial).经桡动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗后桡动脉闭塞及局部血管并发症是否与使用的止血装置类型有关?一项非劣效性随机对照试验(RadCom 试验)。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Aug 20;20(6):580-587. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab004.
8
A randomised controlled study of standard versus accelerated deflation of the Terumo radial band haemostasis device after transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterisation.经桡动脉诊断性心导管插入术后,对比Terumo桡动脉止血装置标准放气与加速放气的随机对照研究。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Apr;16(4):344-351. doi: 10.1177/1474515116672123. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
9
The Effects of Diagnosis-Related Group Payment on Diagnostic Cerebral Angiograms through a Transradial and Transfemoral Approach: A Comparative Observational Study.诊断相关分组支付对经桡动脉和股动脉途径行诊断性脑血管造影的影响:一项比较观察性研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 7;2022:9670757. doi: 10.1155/2022/9670757. eCollection 2022.
10
Transulnar Catheterization in Patients with Failed Ipsilateral Transradial Access: Novel TR Band Modification for Dual-Site Hemostasis.同侧桡动脉穿刺失败患者的经尺动脉置管:用于双部位止血的新型TR带改良
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jan;22:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A predictive model discloses independent risk factors for vascular complications in elderly cerebrovascular accident patients after trans-radial access cerebral angiography.一种预测模型揭示了老年脑血管意外患者经桡动脉途径脑血管造影术后血管并发症的独立危险因素。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Apr 15;17(4):2872-2884. doi: 10.62347/DYLC6571. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial.经远端桡动脉与传统桡动脉入路比较桡动脉长期闭塞的情况(CONDITION):一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03281-7.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting difficult radial artery cannulation in adult surgical patients.成人外科手术患者桡动脉穿刺困难预测列线图的开发与验证
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 19;10(2):e24524. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24524. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
3
The Best Practice For Preventing Radial Artery Occlusion.预防桡动脉闭塞的最佳实践
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Mar 15;215:103. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Distal versus conventional transradial access for diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.诊断性脑血管造影和神经介入手术中远端与传统经桡动脉入路:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Nov 7:15910199231210411. doi: 10.1177/15910199231210411.
5
Comparison Between Distal Trans-radial Access and Conventional Trans-radial Access for Coronary Angiography.冠状动脉造影中桡动脉远端入路与传统桡动脉入路的比较
Cureus. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45081. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45081. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Left Transradial Access Using a Radial-Specific Neurointerventional Guiding Sheath for Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysm Associated With the Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery: Technical Note and Literature Review.经桡动脉入路使用桡动脉专用神经介入导引导鞘对伴有异常右锁骨下动脉的前循环动脉瘤进行线圈栓塞:技术说明和文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Oct;178:126-131. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.07.107. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
7
Association of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (Glu298Asp) gene polymorphism with radial artery spasm during cardiac catheterization in Egyptians.埃及人心导管检查中内皮型一氧化氮合酶(Glu298Asp)基因多态性与桡动脉痉挛的关系。
Mol Biol Rep. 2023 Jul;50(7):5747-5753. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-08434-0. Epub 2023 May 23.
8
Impact of Upper Arm Prolonged Occlusion on Radial Artery Diameter Before Coronary Angiography in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.冠心病患者冠状动脉造影前上臂长时间阻断对桡动脉直径的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jun;51:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.017. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
9
Predictors of radial to femoral artery crossover during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.预测 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉至股动脉交叉的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Sep;36(5):915-923. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.10.018. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
10
Predictors of success and puncture site complications in the distal radial approach.桡骨远端入路成功及穿刺部位并发症的预测因素
Heart Vessels. 2023 Feb;38(2):147-156. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02152-6. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

桡动脉穿刺后最佳压迫方法的研究:一项回顾性研究

Investigating optimal compression approach following radial artery puncture: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Jia Dandan, Chen Yuting, Liu Changyu, Ding Silian, Fang Yibin

机构信息

Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200434, China.

Department of Emergency, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200434, China.

出版信息

Am J Transl Res. 2024 Jun 15;16(6):2389-2397. doi: 10.62347/BWUP6404. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.62347/BWUP6404
PMID:39006301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11236670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The method for compressing hemorrhagic sites after transradial access has been a topic of interest, yet definitive guidelines remain elusive. This study aims to address this gap by optimizing the mechanical compression hemostasis protocol after transradial access.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 300 patients from the Department of Cerebrovascular Diseases, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital affiliated to Tongji University, who underwent transradial access for cerebrovascular angiography. Following the procedure, patients received radial artery compression hemostasis using a balloon compressor. They were divided into group A (n=100, continuous deflation) and group B (n=200, intermittent deflation) according to different hemostasis methods. The incidence of bleeding at the puncture site and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The rate of bleeding at the puncture site was significantly lower in group B (20 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (20 out of 100 patients) (P=0.032). Similarly, the incidence of puncture site complications, such as edema, congestion, and wound infection was lower in group B (5 out of 200 patients) compared to group A (10 out of 100 patients) (P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Four hours of compression with intermittent deflation (group B) emerged as the optimal compression method after transradial access, demonstrating fewer complications at the patient's puncture site.

摘要

背景

经桡动脉穿刺后出血部位的压迫方法一直是人们关注的话题,但明确的指南仍未确定。本研究旨在通过优化经桡动脉穿刺后的机械压迫止血方案来填补这一空白。

方法

这项回顾性分析纳入了同济大学附属上海市第四人民医院脑血管病科的300例接受经桡动脉脑血管造影的患者。术后,患者使用气囊压迫器进行桡动脉压迫止血。根据不同的止血方法,将他们分为A组(n = 100,持续放气)和B组(n = 200,间歇放气)。比较两组穿刺部位出血的发生率和并发症情况。

结果

B组(200例患者中有20例)穿刺部位出血率明显低于A组(100例患者中有20例)(P = 0.032)。同样,B组(200例患者中有5例)穿刺部位并发症如水肿、充血和伤口感染的发生率低于A组(100例患者中有10例)(P = 0.006)。

结论

经桡动脉穿刺后,间歇放气压迫4小时(B组)是最佳压迫方法,在患者穿刺部位显示出较少的并发症。