Raizada Seemant, Al Kandari Jamal, Al Diab Fahad, Al Sabah Khalid, Kumar Niranjan, Mathew Sebastian, Al Dafiri Yousef, Abdul Jaleel Talal, Alrabiah Mahmoud, Al Ajmi Mohammad
Retina Unit, Kuwait Specialized Eye Center, Shaab Al Bahiri, KWT.
Retina Unit, Al Bahar Eye Center, Kuwait City, KWT.
Cureus. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):e62385. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62385. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the timing of the steroid switch on both visual and anatomical outcomes in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that have shown an inadequate response to multiple intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. In the treatment of DME, anti-VEGF injections are typically the initial course of action. However, in cases where DME persists despite anti-VEGF treatment, intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) are often utilized. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for transitioning to steroid treatment. This study aims to shed light on the potential benefits of adjusting the timing of the steroid switch in cases of recalcitrant DME. Methods The eyes (n = 105) of 77 patients with recalcitrant DME were included in this retrospective, interventional, comparative study comprising three groups: participants switched to steroid implants after three anti-VEGF injections (Group I), four to six anti-VEGF injections (Group II), and more than six anti-VEGF injections (Group III). Anti-VEGF treatment failure was defined as a central retinal thickness (CRT) of ≥300 microns and/or a lack of visual improvement (≤1 line of visual gain according to Snellen acuity). The last follow-up took place after 10-12 weeks of Ozurdex injections. Results Improvement was observed in 19 eyes (46%), 17 eyes (50%), and 10 eyes (33%) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, after switching to dexamethasone implants. The best overall results (an improvement in vision and stabilization) were seen in Group II (32 eyes, 94%). The decrease in CRT was statistically significant in all three groups. Conclusion Intravitreal dexamethasone implants improved functional and morphological outcomes in anti-VEGF-resistant DME eyes. After four to six anti-VEGF injections, switching to a steroid implant resulted in the best functional results.
目的 本研究旨在探讨在对多次玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)注射反应不佳的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)眼中,类固醇药物转换时机对视力和解剖学结果的影响。在DME的治疗中,抗VEGF注射通常是初始治疗方案。然而,在抗VEGF治疗后DME仍持续存在的情况下,常使用玻璃体内地塞米松植入物(Ozurdex,Allergan公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)。尽管如此,对于过渡到类固醇治疗的最佳时机仍缺乏共识。本研究旨在阐明在顽固性DME病例中调整类固醇药物转换时机的潜在益处。 方法 本回顾性、干预性、对比研究纳入了77例顽固性DME患者的105只眼,分为三组:三组患者分别在接受3次抗VEGF注射后(第一组)、4至6次抗VEGF注射后(第二组)以及超过6次抗VEGF注射后(第三组)转换为类固醇植入物。抗VEGF治疗失败定义为中心视网膜厚度(CRT)≥300微米和/或视力无改善(根据Snellen视力表视力增益≤1行)。在Ozurdex注射10 - 12周后进行最后一次随访。结果 转换为地塞米松植入物后,第一组、第二组和第三组分别有19只眼(46%)、17只眼(50%)和10只眼(33%)病情改善。第二组(32只眼,94%)的总体效果最佳(视力改善且病情稳定)。三组的CRT降低均具有统计学意义。 结论 玻璃体内地塞米松植入物改善了抗VEGF耐药性DME眼的功能和形态学结果。在进行4至6次抗VEGF注射后转换为类固醇植入物可获得最佳功能结果。