• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
ChatGPT-4 Generates More Accurate and Complete Responses to Common Patient Questions About Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Than Google's Search Engine.与谷歌搜索引擎相比,ChatGPT-4对前交叉韧带重建常见患者问题的回答更准确、更完整。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 9;6(3):100939. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100939. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Understanding How ChatGPT May Become a Clinical Administrative Tool Through an Investigation on the Ability to Answer Common Patient Questions Concerning Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries.通过对ChatGPT回答有关尺侧副韧带损伤常见患者问题能力的调查,了解其如何成为临床管理工具。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jul 31;12(7):23259671241257516. doi: 10.1177/23259671241257516. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Evaluation of Patient Education Materials From Large-Language Artificial Intelligence Models on Carpal Tunnel Release.基于大语言人工智能模型的腕管松解术患者教育材料评估
Hand (N Y). 2024 Apr 25:15589447241247332. doi: 10.1177/15589447241247332.
4
Using a Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Total Joint Arthroplasty.利用谷歌网页搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在全关节置换中的效用。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
5
ChatGPT as a Source of Patient Information for Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Laminectomy: A Comparative Analysis Against Google Web Search.ChatGPT 作为腰椎融合和椎板切除术患者信息的来源:与谷歌网页搜索的对比分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E394-E403. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001582. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Consulting the Digital Doctor: Google Versus ChatGPT as Sources of Information on Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma and Breast Implant Illness.咨询数字医生:谷歌与 ChatGPT 在乳房植入物相关间变大细胞淋巴瘤和乳房植入物病信息源方面的比较。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Feb;48(4):590-607. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03713-4. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
7
Evaluating ChatGPT's Utility in Medicine Guidelines Through Web Search Analysis.通过网络搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在医学指南中的效用。
Perm J. 2024 Jun 14;28(2):55-69. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.126. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Using Google web search to analyze and evaluate the application of ChatGPT in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.利用谷歌网页搜索分析和评估 ChatGPT 在股骨髋臼撞击综合征中的应用。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 31;12:1412063. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1412063. eCollection 2024.
9
ChatGPT Provides Unsatisfactory Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.ChatGPT 对前交叉韧带重建相关常见问题的回答不尽如人意。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Jul;40(7):2067-2079.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
10
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.谷歌医生与ChatGPT医生:通过比较关于白内障及白内障手术的常见患者问题的回答的准确性、安全性和可读性,探索人工智能在眼科领域的应用。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):472-479. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2326058. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A custom ChatGPT can accurately answer questions from an international expert osteotomy consensus statement.定制的ChatGPT可以准确回答来自国际专家截骨术共识声明的问题。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 16;35(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04373-7.
2
The Emergence of Applied Artificial Intelligence in the Realm of Value Based Musculoskeletal Care.基于价值的肌肉骨骼护理领域中应用人工智能的出现。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09982-7.
3
Is it a pediatric orthopaedic urgency or not? Can ChatGPT answer this question?这是否属于小儿骨科急症?ChatGPT能回答这个问题吗?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 4;20(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05981-z.

本文引用的文献

1
What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.患者在网上搜索半月板手术时会遇到什么?互联网趋势分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):23259671231219014. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219014. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Indications for Surgery, Activities After Surgery, and Pain Are the Most Commonly Asked Questions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction.手术适应症、术后活动及疼痛是前交叉韧带损伤与重建中最常被问到的问题。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 17;5(5):100805. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100805. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Integrating ChatGPT in Medical Education: Adapting Curricula to Cultivate Competent Physicians for the AI Era.将ChatGPT整合到医学教育中:调整课程以培养适应人工智能时代的合格医生。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 6;15(8):e43036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43036. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Evaluation High-Quality of Information from ChatGPT (Artificial Intelligence-Large Language Model) Artificial Intelligence on Shoulder Stabilization Surgery.评估 ChatGPT(人工智能-大型语言模型)在肩稳定手术方面的信息质量。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Mar;40(3):726-731.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.07.048. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
5
Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for providing orthopaedic information.探索 ChatGPT 作为提供骨科信息的补充工具的潜力。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):5190-5198. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07529-2. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
Artificial intelligence and ChatGPT in Orthopaedics and sports medicine.人工智能与ChatGPT在骨科和运动医学中的应用
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Jul 26;10(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00642-8.
7
Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty.评估 ChatGPT 对全髋关节置换术常见患者问题的回答。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1519-1526. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00209. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Emergency surgery in the era of artificial intelligence: ChatGPT could be the doctor's right-hand man.人工智能时代的急诊手术:ChatGPT可能成为医生的得力助手。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jun 1;109(6):1816-1818. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000410.
9
Using a Google Web Search Analysis to Assess the Utility of ChatGPT in Total Joint Arthroplasty.利用谷歌网页搜索分析评估 ChatGPT 在全关节置换中的效用。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul;38(7):1195-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
10
Overview of Early ChatGPT's Presence in Medical Literature: Insights From a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts.早期ChatGPT在医学文献中的呈现概述:来自ChatGPT与人类专家的混合文献综述的见解
Cureus. 2023 Apr 8;15(4):e37281. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37281. eCollection 2023 Apr.

与谷歌搜索引擎相比,ChatGPT-4对前交叉韧带重建常见患者问题的回答更准确、更完整。

ChatGPT-4 Generates More Accurate and Complete Responses to Common Patient Questions About Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Than Google's Search Engine.

作者信息

Gaudiani Michael A, Castle Joshua P, Abbas Muhammad J, Pratt Brittaney A, Myles Marquisha D, Moutzouros Vasilios, Lynch T Sean

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 9;6(3):100939. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100939. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100939
PMID:39006779
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11240040/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To replicate a patient's internet search to evaluate ChatGPT's appropriateness in answering common patient questions about anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with a Google web search.

METHODS

A Google web search was performed by searching the term "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction." The top 20 frequently asked questions and responses were recorded. The prompt "What are the 20 most popular patient questions related to 'anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?'" was input into ChatGPT and questions and responses were recorded. Questions were classified based on the Rothwell system and responses assessed via Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, correctness, and completeness were for both Google web search and ChatGPT.

RESULTS

Three of 20 (15%) questions were similar between Google web search and ChatGPT. The most common question types among the Google web search were value (8/20, 40%), fact (7/20, 35%), and policy (5/20, 25%). The most common question types amongst the ChatGPT search were fact (12/20, 60%), policy (6/20, 30%), and value (2/20, 10%). Mean Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level for Google web search responses was significantly lower (11.8 ± 3.8 vs 14.3 ± 2.2;  = .003) than for ChatGPT responses. The mean correctness for Google web search question answers was 1.47 ± 0.5, and mean completeness was 1.36 ± 0.5. Mean correctness for ChatGPT answers was 1.8 ± 0.4 and mean completeness was 1.9 ± 0.3, which were both significantly greater than Google web search answers ( = .03 and  = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT-4 generated more accurate and complete responses to common patient questions about anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction than Google's search engine.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of artificial intelligence such as ChatGPT is expanding. It is important to understand the quality of information as well as how the results of ChatGPT queries compare with those from Google web searches.

摘要

目的

复制患者的网络搜索,以评估ChatGPT在回答有关前交叉韧带重建的常见患者问题方面与谷歌网络搜索相比的适用性。

方法

通过搜索术语“前交叉韧带重建”进行谷歌网络搜索。记录前20个常见问题及答案。将提示语“与‘前交叉韧带重建’相关的20个最常见患者问题是什么?”输入ChatGPT,并记录问题及答案。根据罗斯韦尔系统对问题进行分类,并通过弗莱什-金凯德年级水平、正确性和完整性对谷歌网络搜索和ChatGPT的答案进行评估。

结果

谷歌网络搜索和ChatGPT之间的20个问题中有3个(15%)相似。谷歌网络搜索中最常见的问题类型是价值类(8/20,40%)、事实类(7/20,35%)和政策类(5/20,25%)。ChatGPT搜索中最常见的问题类型是事实类(12/20,60%)、政策类(6/20,30%)和价值类(2/20,10%)。谷歌网络搜索答案的平均弗莱什-金凯德年级水平显著低于ChatGPT答案(11.8±3.8对14.3±2.2;P = 0.003)。谷歌网络搜索问题答案的平均正确性为1.47±0.5,平均完整性为1.36±0.5。ChatGPT答案的平均正确性为1.8±0.4,平均完整性为1.9±0.3,均显著高于谷歌网络搜索答案(P = 0.03和P = 0.0003)。

结论

ChatGPT-4对有关前交叉韧带重建的常见患者问题生成的回答比谷歌搜索引擎更准确、更完整。

临床相关性

ChatGPT等人工智能的应用正在扩大。了解信息质量以及ChatGPT查询结果与谷歌网络搜索结果的比较情况非常重要。