Suppr超能文献

掺杂生物活性玻璃的树脂浸润剂的体外物理化学比较分析

A Comparative In Vitro Physicochemical Analysis of Resin Infiltrants Doped With Bioactive Glasses.

作者信息

Ahmed Syed Zubairuddin, Khan Abdul S, Aljeshi Naemah M, Md Sabri Budi A, Akhtar Sultan, Abu Hassan Mohamed Ibrahim

机构信息

Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64500. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64500. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the longevity and effectiveness of bioactive glass (BAG)-based dental resin infiltrants. Materials and methods The three types of BAG - 45S5 bioglass (RIS), boron-substituted (RIB), and fluoride-substituted (RIF) - were incorporated with photoinitiated dimethacrylate monomers to create experimental resin infiltrants. ICON (CN; DMG-America, Ridgefield Park, NJ) and pure resin (PR) were used as control groups in this study. Disc-shaped samples were prepared for the experimental and control groups. The samples were challenged with the pH cycle and immersed in the artificial saliva for 30 days. On Day 0 and Day 30, the pH cycle and artificial saliva immersion, Vicker's microhardness, surface roughness, and surface morphology were investigated. Results The RIF group's disc samples showed the highest Vicker's microhardness values (78.20 ±0.06) on Day 30 of artificial saliva immersion, whereas the CN group's values were the lowest (55.99 ±0.24). Following the pH cycling, the RIF displayed the highest hardness (64.15 ±1.89) whereas the CN group's values were the lowest (33.47 ±1.28). Regarding surface roughness, on Day 30, the RIB resin group exhibited the highest (1.14 ±0.001 µm). In contrast, the CN resin showed the lowest (1.07 ±0.06 µm) values, while immersed in the artificial saliva solution. In the same duration of time, in the pH cycling solution, PR showed the least (0.85 ±0.89 µm), while RIF showed the highest roughness value (0.94 ±0.54 µm). Morphological analysis revealed that following the artificial saliva immersion, the RIB, CN, and PR exhibited smoother surfaces compared to the RIS and RIF groups. However, when immersed in the pH cycling solution, RIB and RIF showed more resistance against acid attack. Conclusions Our results revealed that the experimental resin groups performed much better than the commercial resin infiltrants following artificial saliva and pH cycling challenges.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在调查基于生物活性玻璃(BAG)的牙科树脂浸润剂的耐久性和有效性。材料与方法 将三种类型的BAG-45S5生物玻璃(RIS)、硼取代型(RIB)和氟取代型(RIF)与光引发二甲基丙烯酸酯单体混合,制成实验性树脂浸润剂。本研究中使用ICON(CN;DMG-美国公司,新泽西州里奇菲尔德帕克)和纯树脂(PR)作为对照组。为实验组和对照组制备圆盘形样本。对样本进行pH循环处理,并将其浸入人工唾液中30天。在第0天和第30天,对pH循环和人工唾液浸泡、维氏显微硬度、表面粗糙度和表面形态进行研究。结果 在人工唾液浸泡第30天时,RIF组的圆盘样本显示出最高的维氏显微硬度值(78.20±0.06),而CN组的值最低(55.99±0.24)。经过pH循环后,RIF显示出最高的硬度(64.15±1.89),而CN组的值最低(33.47±1.28)。关于表面粗糙度,在第30天,RIB树脂组表现出最高值(1.14±0.001µm)。相比之下,浸入人工唾液溶液时,CN树脂显示出最低值(1.07±0.06µm)。在相同时间内,在pH循环溶液中,PR显示出最小值(0.85±0.89µm),而RIF显示出最高粗糙度值(0.94±0.54µm)。形态分析表明,人工唾液浸泡后,与RIS和RIF组相比,RIB、CN和PR的表面更光滑。然而,当浸入pH循环溶液中时,RIB和RIF对酸侵蚀表现出更强的抵抗力。结论 我们的结果表明,在人工唾液和pH循环挑战后,实验性树脂组的表现远优于商业树脂浸润剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/598e/11246546/68fb0ea7fca0/cureus-0016-00000064500-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验