• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在跨学科研究中培养反思性影响导向——一种多方法工作坊形式

Fostering reflective impact orientation in transdisciplinary research-A multi-method workshop format.

作者信息

Schäfer Martina, Nagy Emilia, Kny Josefa

机构信息

Technische Universität Berlin, ZTG - Center for Technology and Society, Kaiserin-Augusta-Allee 104, 10553 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2024 Jun 5;13:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102795. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2024.102795
PMID:39007029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11245923/
Abstract

The primary objective of transdisciplinary research (TDR) is to contribute to the solution of complex 'real-world' problems by integrating heterogeneous knowledge and achieving societal effects. However, establishing a continuous impact orientation during TDR processes remains a challenge, as the necessary tools are not yet sufficiently available. We developed and tested a half-day workshop format for strengthening the impact-oriented project management and research activities of seven TDR projects. Our findings indicate that the reflective impact workshops supported participants in pursuing societal effects systematically. Applying the methodological approach also fosters TDR process qualities such as knowledge integration. Conducted at different project stages, the results can serve as a basis for monitoring and adapting the project design. The reflective approach•includes scientific and non-scientific TDR project team members,•draws on Theory of Change as a conceptual framework and motivates participants to reflect on plausible impact pathways and make implicit assumptions about interlinkages between different forms of societal effects explicit, and•provides results which enable project partners to adjust their project design for greater societal effectiveness.

摘要

跨学科研究(TDR)的主要目标是通过整合异质知识并实现社会效应,为解决复杂的“现实世界”问题做出贡献。然而,在TDR过程中建立持续的影响导向仍然是一项挑战,因为必要的工具尚未充分具备。我们开发并测试了一种为期半天的研讨会形式,以加强七个TDR项目的以影响为导向的项目管理和研究活动。我们的研究结果表明,反思性影响研讨会支持参与者系统地追求社会效应。应用这种方法还能提升TDR过程的质量,如知识整合。在不同项目阶段开展,其结果可作为监测和调整项目设计的依据。这种反思性方法•包括科学和非科学TDR项目团队成员,•借鉴变革理论作为概念框架,促使参与者思考合理的影响路径,并使关于不同形式社会效应之间相互联系的隐含假设变得明确,并且•提供的结果能使项目合作伙伴调整其项目设计,以提高社会有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/e48a48afedd1/gr5b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/22707f30472e/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/f0d784c497d6/gr1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/61e1c609beca/gr1b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/2cc5ff0def51/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/528884c63761/gr2b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/4a797cbe7bdb/gr3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/b37c225a1472/gr3b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/645f49068744/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/72c25531d735/gr4b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/e7f1948647c7/gr5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/e48a48afedd1/gr5b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/22707f30472e/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/f0d784c497d6/gr1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/61e1c609beca/gr1b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/2cc5ff0def51/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/528884c63761/gr2b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/4a797cbe7bdb/gr3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/b37c225a1472/gr3b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/645f49068744/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/72c25531d735/gr4b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/e7f1948647c7/gr5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6105/11245923/e48a48afedd1/gr5b.jpg

相似文献

1
Fostering reflective impact orientation in transdisciplinary research-A multi-method workshop format.在跨学科研究中培养反思性影响导向——一种多方法工作坊形式
MethodsX. 2024 Jun 5;13:102795. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102795. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Different perspectives on a common goal? The Q-method as a formative assessment to elucidate varying expectations towards transdisciplinary research collaborations.对共同目标的不同观点?作为一种形成性评估的Q方法,以阐明对跨学科研究合作的不同期望。
Sustain Sci. 2022;17(6):2459-2472. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01192-1. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method.衡量跨学科研究项目的社会影响:一种评估方法的设计与应用
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):325-38. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Aug 19.
4
From reflection diaries to practical guidance for transdisciplinary research: learnings from a Kenyan air pollution project.从反思日记到跨学科研究的实践指南:肯尼亚空气污染项目的经验教训
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(3):1429-1444. doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01317-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
5
A new transdisciplinary research model to investigate and improve the health of the public.一种新的跨学科研究模式,旨在调查和改善公众健康。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Apr 15;36(2):481-492. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa125.
6
Transdisciplinary research in support of land and water management in China and Southeast Asia: evaluation of four research projects.支持中国和东南亚土地与水资源管理的跨学科研究:四个研究项目评估
Sustain Sci. 2016;11(5):813-829. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0378-0. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
How context affects transdisciplinary research: insights from Asia, Africa and Latin America.背景如何影响跨学科研究:来自亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲的见解。
Sustain Sci. 2022;17(6):2331-2345. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01201-3. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
Chinese villages and their sustainable future: the European Union-China-Research Project "SUCCESS".中国乡村及其可持续未来:欧盟-中国研究项目“SUCCESS”
J Environ Manage. 2008 Apr;87(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
9
Bringing Transdisciplinary Aging Research From Theory to Practice.将跨学科衰老研究从理论付诸实践。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):159-168. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa214.
10
On which common ground to build? Transferable knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary sustainability research.在何种共同基础上进行构建?跨学科可持续性研究中跨案例的可转移知识。
Sustain Sci. 2021;16(6):1891-1905. doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-01010-0. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A refined method for theory-based evaluation of the societal impacts of research.一种基于理论的研究社会影响评估的精细方法。
MethodsX. 2020 Jan 23;7:100788. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100788. eCollection 2020.
2
Assumptions, conjectures, and other miracles: The application of evaluative thinking to theory of change models in community development.假设、推测及其他奇迹:评估性思维在社区发展变革理论模型中的应用
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Dec;59:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 Jun 3.