• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 1050Hz 消融频率下,SMILE 和 SmartPulse 技术辅助 TransPRK 治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。

Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2024 Jul;40(7):e490-e498. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240514-01. Epub 2024 Jul 1.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20240514-01
PMID:39007811
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the objective visual quality of moderate-to-high myopia corrected by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) at a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency, assisted by Smart-Pulse technology (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).

METHODS

This study involved 123 patients (123 eyes) with moderate-to-high myopia between July 2020 and January 2021. They were categorized into the SMILE group (67 patients, 67 eyes) and the TransPRK group (56 patients, 56 eyes). Follow-ups were conducted at 6 months postoperatively to record the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity, and the Strehl ratio and higher order aberrations were measured using the Sirius anterior segment analysis device (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) under a 6-mm pupil diameter at various postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) in the SMILE group was superior to that in the TransPRK group ( < .05 for both). At 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, the Strehl ratio value in the SMILE group was higher than that in the TransPRK group ( < .05 for both). At 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, coma was greater in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group ( < .05 for all). Spherical aberrations were lower in the SMILE group than in the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively ( < .05). At 6 months postoperatively, UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.08 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logMAR in the SMILE and TransPRK groups, respectively, which exceeded their preoperative corrected distance visual acuity of -0.05 ± 0.04 and -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR (all < .001). Compared with preoperative values, the Strehl ratio, total higher order, coma, and spherical aberration differences were significantly increased postoperatively in both groups (all < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical methods improved UDVA and each had its advantages. The visual quality of SMILE was superior at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (Strehl ratio values were higher than those of the TransPRK group), and its spherical aberration was lower than that of the TransPRK group at 3 and 6 months; TransPRK with SmartPulse technology with a 1,050-Hz ablation frequency showed that coma was significantly lower than that of the SMILE group at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. .

摘要

目的

比较 1050Hz 频率消融时采用小切口微透镜提取术(SMILE)和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(TransPRK)治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量,两种术式均采用 Smart-Pulse 技术(SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions)辅助。

方法

本研究纳入 2020 年 7 月至 2021 年 1 月的 123 例(123 只眼)中高度近视患者,根据术式分为 SMILE 组(67 例,67 只眼)和 TransPRK 组(56 例,56 只眼)。术后 6 个月进行随访,记录最佳矫正视力的 logMAR 视力值,使用 Sirius 眼前节分析系统(SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions)在 6mm 瞳孔直径下测量 6 个月内各时间点的斯特列尔比和高阶像差。

结果

术后 1 周和 1 个月时,SMILE 组的未矫正远视力(UDVA)优于 TransPRK 组(均<0.05)。术后 1 周和 1 个月时,SMILE 组的斯特列尔比均高于 TransPRK 组(均<0.05)。术后 1、3 和 6 个月时,SMILE 组的彗差均大于 TransPRK 组(均<0.05)。术后 3 和 6 个月时,SMILE 组的球差均低于 TransPRK 组(均<0.05)。术后 6 个月时,SMILE 组和 TransPRK 组的 UDVA 分别为-0.09±0.08 和-0.11±0.05 logMAR,均优于术前的-0.05±0.04 和-0.09±0.08 logMAR(均<0.001)。与术前相比,两组术后的斯特列尔比、总高阶像差、彗差和球差差值均显著增加(均<0.001)。

结论

两种手术方式均改善了 UDVA,且各有优势。SMILE 组术后 1 周和 1 个月时视觉质量较好(斯特列尔比高于 TransPRK 组),术后 3 和 6 个月时球差低于 TransPRK 组;采用 SmartPulse 技术的 1050Hz 频率消融 TransPRK 组术后 1、3 和 6 个月时的彗差明显低于 SMILE 组。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.在 1050Hz 消融频率下,SMILE 和 SmartPulse 技术辅助 TransPRK 治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Jul;40(7):e490-e498. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240514-01. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
2
Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Myopia.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术和小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)治疗近视的视觉和屈光效果
J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(9):604-10. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160602-02.
3
Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK.近视 LASIK、SMILE 和 TransPRK 术后残余屈光误差、眼像差和调节状态。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Oct 1;35(10):624-631. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190916-02.
4
Comparison of Outcomes after Wavefront-optimized and Topography-guided Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy.波前像差引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与角膜地形引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术术后效果比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;38(4):275-283. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2024.0027. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
5
Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction.比较角膜波前引导经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与小切口微透镜取出术对角膜高阶像差的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jun;44(6):725-733. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.028. Epub 2018 May 19.
6
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy in Moderate to High Astigmatism With a Non-wavefront-Guided Aberration-Neutral Ablation Profile.采用非波前引导的像差中和消融模式对中高度散光进行经上皮光屈光性角膜切削术。
J Refract Surg. 2018 Jul 1;34(7):466-474. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180402-04.
7
Comparison of visual quality after Femto-LASIK and TransPRK in patients with low and moderate myopia.Femto-LASIK 和 TransPRK 治疗低度和中度近视患者的视觉质量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;40(6):1419-1428. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01308-5. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
8
Customized Wavefront-Optimized Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy for a Retained Lenticule Fragment After Primary SMILE.定制化波前像差引导的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗 SMILE 术后遗留的角膜透镜碎片
J Refract Surg. 2020 Jun 1;36(6):395-399. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200512-01.
9
Clinical Outcomes of SMILE With a Triple Centration Technique and Corneal Wavefront-Guided Transepithelial PRK in High Astigmatism.采用三重定心技术的全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术及角膜波前引导的经上皮准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗高度散光的临床疗效
J Refract Surg. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):156-163. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03.
10
Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.高度近视的小切口微透镜取出术与飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 的视力结果。
Ophthalmic Res. 2020;63(4):427-433. doi: 10.1159/000504304. Epub 2019 Dec 5.