• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Femto-LASIK 和 TransPRK 治疗低度和中度近视患者的视觉质量比较。

Comparison of visual quality after Femto-LASIK and TransPRK in patients with low and moderate myopia.

机构信息

Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Dong Xia North Road, Shantou, Guangdong Province, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;40(6):1419-1428. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01308-5. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-020-01308-5
PMID:32076966
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the visual quality after surgery of femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) in low and moderate myopia patients.

METHODS

A prospective controlled study was performed on 114 eyes of 62 patients with low to moderate myopia, including 64 eyes of 36 cases in Femto-LASIK group and 50 eyes of 26 cases in TransPRK group. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), residual spherical equivalent (SE), wavefront aberration and contrast sensitivity were examined and analyses preoperatively, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The UCVA over 0.8 was 100% in two groups at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. Femto-LASIK group (96.49%) had a higher percentage than TransPRK group (67.39%) of UCVA over 1.0 at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.001), but it was similar in two groups (97.78%, 90.48%) at 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.15). Femto-LASIK group (77.19%, 86.67%) had a higher percentage than TransPRK group (30.43%, 52.38%) of UCVA over 1.2 at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). The SE of Femto-LASIK group was 0.07 ± 0.21 D, 0.02 ± 0.23 D at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively, and of TransPRK group was 0.11 ± 0.31 D, 0.14 ± 0.38 D; two groups had no significant differences (p = 0.57, p = 0.08). The safety index was 2.0 in Femto-LASIK group and 1.6 in TransPRK, while the efficacy index was 1.67 and 0.4, respectively. The vertical coma, spherical and higher-order aberrations of Femto-LASIK group were 0.37 ± 0.54 μm, 0.31 ± 0.27 μm, 0.89 ± 0.49 μm at 1 month postoperatively, and of TransPRK group were 0.12 ± 0.38 μm, 0.14 ± 0.28 μm, 0.71 ± 0.26 μm. There was significant difference between two groups at 1 months postoperatively (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.006), but no significant difference at 3 months (p > 0.05). The contrast sensitivity without glare in 18 c/d spatial frequencies of Femto-LASIK group was 1.08 ± 0.26 at 1 month postoperatively, and that in TransPRK group was 0.99 ± 0.22. There was significant difference between two groups (p = 0.02). The contrast sensitivity with glare in 12 c/d and 18 c/d spatial frequencies at 1 month postoperatively had significant differences between Femto-LASIK and TransPRK groups (1.52 ± 0.17, 1.10 ± 0.23 vs 1.38 ± 0.39, 1.00 ± 0.27, p = 0.02, p = 0.03). While there were no significant differences at 3 months postoperatively (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Femto-LASIK had a higher increase in whole eye higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity than TransPRK at 1 month postoperatively, but they were similar at 3 months postoperatively in low and moderate myopia patients.

摘要

目的

比较飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Femto-LASIK)和经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(TransPRK)治疗低中度近视患者的术后视觉质量。

方法

对 62 例低中度近视患者的 114 只眼进行前瞻性对照研究,其中 Femto-LASIK 组 64 只眼 36 例,TransPRK 组 50 只眼 26 例。分别于术前、术后 1 个月和 3 个月检查未矫正视力(UCVA)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、残余等效球镜(SE)、波前像差和对比敏感度。

结果

术后 1 个月和 3 个月时,两组 UCVA 均超过 0.8。Femto-LASIK 组(96.49%)术后 1 个月时 UCVA 超过 1.0 的比例(97.78%)高于 TransPRK 组(67.39%)(p<0.001),但两组术后 3 个月时(p=0.15)差异无统计学意义。术后 1 个月和 3 个月时,Femto-LASIK 组 UCVA 超过 1.2 的比例(77.19%、86.67%)均高于 TransPRK 组(30.43%、52.38%)(p<0.001,p=0.001)。Femto-LASIK 组术后 1 个月和 3 个月时 SE 分别为 0.07±0.21 D、0.02±0.23 D,TransPRK 组分别为 0.11±0.31 D、0.14±0.38 D;两组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.57,p=0.08)。Femto-LASIK 组安全性指数为 2.0,效能指数为 1.67;TransPRK 组安全性指数为 1.6,效能指数为 0.4。术后 1 个月时,Femto-LASIK 组垂直彗差、球差和高阶像差分别为 0.37±0.54 μm、0.31±0.27 μm、0.89±0.49 μm,TransPRK 组分别为 0.12±0.38 μm、0.14±0.28 μm、0.71±0.26 μm;两组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.001,p=0.001,p=0.006),但术后 3 个月时差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术后 1 个月时,Femto-LASIK 组无眩光 18 c/d 空间频率的对比敏感度为 1.08±0.26,TransPRK 组为 0.99±0.22。两组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.02)。术后 1 个月时,Femto-LASIK 组 12 c/d 和 18 c/d 空间频率的眩光对比敏感度与 TransPRK 组比较,差异均有统计学意义(1.52±0.17、1.10±0.23 比 1.38±0.39、1.00±0.27,p=0.02,p=0.03);但术后 3 个月时差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术在术后 1 个月时比经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术引起的全眼高阶像差和对比敏感度增加更高,但在术后 3 个月时两者相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison of visual quality after Femto-LASIK and TransPRK in patients with low and moderate myopia.Femto-LASIK 和 TransPRK 治疗低度和中度近视患者的视觉质量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;40(6):1419-1428. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01308-5. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
2
Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality.飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗高度近视的比较:18个月视力及视觉质量对比
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;37(4):995-1001. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0364-7. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond-assisted laser keratomileusis for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.低中度近视散光患者行一步法经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与飞秒激光辅助制瓣准分子激光角膜磨镶术后的像散矫正的向量分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;70(10):3483-3489. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_649_22.
4
Femtosecond-Assisted LASIK Versus PRK: Comparison of 6-Month Visual Acuity and Quality Outcome for High Myopia.飞秒激光辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术与准分子激光角膜切削术治疗高度近视的6个月视力及视觉质量比较
Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Nov;42(6):354-357. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000216.
5
Status of Residual Refractive Error, Ocular Aberrations, and Accommodation After Myopic LASIK, SMILE, and TransPRK.近视 LASIK、SMILE 和 TransPRK 术后残余屈光误差、眼像差和调节状态。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Oct 1;35(10):624-631. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190916-02.
6
Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.用于中高度近视的球面和非球面光性屈光性角膜切削术及准分子原位角膜磨镶术:两项前瞻性随机临床试验。Summit技术公司PRK-LASIK研究组
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1998;96:197-221; discussion 221-7.
7
Comparison of Objective Visual Quality Following SMILE and SmartPulse Technology-Assisted TransPRK at a 1,050-Hz Ablation Frequency for Moderate-to-High Myopia.在 1050Hz 消融频率下,SMILE 和 SmartPulse 技术辅助 TransPRK 治疗中高度近视的客观视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Jul;40(7):e490-e498. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240514-01. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
8
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.
9
[Comparison of visual acuity and higher-order aberrations after standard and wavefront-guided myopic femtosecond LASIK].标准与波前引导的近视飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后视力与高阶像差的比较
Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2015 Jan;71(1):44-50.
10
Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (Lasik) versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (Prk): a prospective randomized eye-to-eye comparison (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).波前像差引导的准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)与波前像差引导的准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK):一项前瞻性随机双眼对照研究(美国眼科学会论文)
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2011 Dec;109:201-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.经上皮光性角膜切削术与准分子原位角膜磨镶术的进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;14(5):481. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050481.
2
Comparison of Vision Correction and Corneal Thickness at 180-Day Follow-Up After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In-Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK), and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Study from a Single Center in Poland of 120 Patients with Myopia.飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)、准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)和小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)术后 180 天视力矫正和角膜厚度比较:波兰单中心 120 例近视患者研究
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Feb 16;29:e939099. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939099.
3
Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia.飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)与smart全激光手术治疗近视的客观视觉质量对比研究
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Mar 18;15(3):502-509. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.03.20. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy and safety of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with the all-surface laser ablation SCHWIND platform without mitomycin-C for high myopia: A retrospective study of 69 eyes.全表面激光消融 SCHWIND 平台行一步式经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术治疗高度近视的有效性和安全性:一项 69 眼回顾性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0259993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259993. eCollection 2021.