Department of Nursing Administration, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nursing Department, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Jul 16;38(5):705-723. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2023-0096.
This study, by applying the feedback process of the organizational learning model, examined the relationships among group learning, individuals' and groups' internalization of institutionalized evidence-based practice (I-EBP), and nurses' sustainment of I-EBP.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Twelve hospitals were included in this cross-sectional study, with 1,741 nurses from 59 wards. Anonymous questionnaires were administered from October to December 2021. Participants self-reported their wards' group learning, internalization of I-EBP, sustainment of I-EBP, EBP beliefs, intra-hospital transfers, and nursing research experiences. The number of nurses and I-EBP introduction length and type of I-EBP were assessed. Internalization of I-EBP of nurses and groups was considered the mediating variable, while group learning and nurses' sustainment of I-EBP were the independent and dependent variables, respectively. Significant variables in bivariate analyses were used as control variables. Multi-level Mediation Analysis and a significance test of indirect effect using the bootstrap method were conducted.
Responses from 360 nurses in 48 wards from 12 hospitals were analyzed. Groups' internalization of I-EBP significantly mediated the relationship between group learning and nurses' sustainment of I-EBP. In contrast, no significant mediating effect of nurses' internalization of I-EBP was observed.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: In the feedback process of organizational learning, group learning and its subsequent effects on individuals and groups have not been previously examined. Regardless of the nurses' degree of internalization of I-EBP, those who belong to the ward with a high degree of internalization of I-EBP are more likely to sustain it. Conducting group learning may prevent superficial practice, resulting in its sustainability.
本研究应用组织学习模型的反馈过程,考察了群体学习、个体和群体对制度化循证实践(I-EBP)的内化以及护士对 I-EBP 的持续应用之间的关系。
设计/方法/方法:本横断面研究纳入了 12 家医院,共有 59 个病房的 1741 名护士。2021 年 10 月至 12 月期间,采用匿名问卷进行调查。参与者自我报告其所在病房的群体学习、I-EBP 的内化、I-EBP 的持续应用、EBP 信念、院内转科和护理研究经验。评估了护士人数和 I-EBP 的引入时间以及 I-EBP 的类型。护士和群体对 I-EBP 的内化被视为中介变量,而群体学习和护士对 I-EBP 的持续应用分别为自变量和因变量。将二变量分析中的显著变量作为控制变量。进行了多层次中介分析和使用 bootstrap 方法的间接效应显著性检验。
对来自 12 家医院 48 个病房的 360 名护士的回复进行了分析。群体对 I-EBP 的内化显著中介了群体学习与护士对 I-EBP 的持续应用之间的关系。相比之下,护士对 I-EBP 的内化没有表现出显著的中介效应。
原创性/价值:在组织学习的反馈过程中,群体学习及其对个体和群体的后续影响尚未得到先前的研究。无论护士对 I-EBP 的内化程度如何,那些属于高度内化 I-EBP 的病房的护士更有可能持续应用它。开展群体学习可能会防止表面化的实践,从而使其具有可持续性。