Herron Grace C, DeCamillo Deborah, Kong Xiaowen, Haymart Brian, Kaatz Scott, Ellsworth Stacy, Ali Mona A, Giuliano Christopher, Froehlich James B, Barnes Geoffrey D
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
Thromb Haemost. 2025 Mar;125(3):278-285. doi: 10.1055/a-2365-8681. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be viewed as simpler to manage then warfarin, they present their own unique management challenges resulting in frequent off-label dosing. It is unknown to what extent off-label dosing occurs when a patient is started on a DOAC versus later in their treatment.
We aimed to better characterize when off-label DOAC dosing is occurring and to evaluate the effectiveness of prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention.
We evaluated data from the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI) registry, a retrospective quality-improvement process using data abstractors, from 2018 to 2022 on the number of "alerts" that are generated in response to dosing deviating from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration instructions for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Among a sample of 789 to 1,022 annual AF patients and 381 to 484 annual VTE patients prescribed a DOAC in the MAQI registry, off-label dosing was relatively common. Over the 5-year period (2018-2022), there were 569 alerts for AF patients and 162 alerts for VTE patients. Alerts occurred more frequently during follow-up than at the time of initial prescribing in AF patients (78.2 vs. 21.8%), but more commonly at initial prescribing in VTE patients (59.9 vs. 40.1%). After initial review by quality-improvement abstractors, 19.3% of AF alerts and 14.8% of VTE alerts resulted in contact to the prescriber. When the prescriber was contacted, it led to an intervention about 75% of the time for both populations. The most common intervention was a change in DOAC dosing.
This study demonstrates the benefit of DOAC prescribing oversight using a registry-based intervention to monitor for off-label dosing for the entirety of the time period a patient is prescribed DOAC, particularly for patients with AF, as off-label prescribing occurs frequently during the follow-up period.
虽然直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)可能被认为比华法林更易于管理,但它们也带来了自身独特的管理挑战,导致频繁的超说明书用药。当患者开始使用DOAC与在治疗后期相比,超说明书用药发生的程度尚不清楚。
我们旨在更好地描述超说明书DOAC用药何时发生,并使用基于注册的干预措施评估处方监督的有效性。
我们评估了密歇根抗凝质量改进计划(MAQI)注册中心的数据,这是一个使用数据提取员的回顾性质量改进过程,数据来自2018年至2022年,关于因给药偏离美国食品药品监督管理局针对心房颤动(AF)和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的用药说明而产生的“警报”数量。
在MAQI注册中心每年开具DOAC的789至1022例AF患者和381至484例VTE患者样本中,超说明书用药相对常见。在5年期间(2018 - 2022年),AF患者有569次警报,VTE患者有162次警报。AF患者随访期间警报发生频率高于初始处方时(78.2%对21.8%),但VTE患者初始处方时更常见(59.9%对40.1%)。经质量改进提取员初步审查后,19.3%的AF警报和14.8%的VTE警报导致与开处方者联系。当与开处方者联系时,在这两个人群中约75%的情况下会导致干预。最常见的干预是改变DOAC剂量。
本研究证明了使用基于注册的干预措施进行DOAC处方监督的益处,以在患者开具DOAC的整个时间段内监测超说明书用药,特别是对于AF患者,因为超说明书处方在随访期间经常发生。