Martins Sarah Craveiro, Tararam Cibele Aparecida, Levy Larissa Ortolan, Arai Teppei, Watanabe Akira, Moretti Maria Luiza, Trabasso Plínio
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) - Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Laboratório de Epidemiologia Molecular e Doenças Infecciosas (LEMDI), Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Chiba University, Division of Clinical Research, Medical Mycology Research Center (MMRC), Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, Japan.
Braz J Infect Dis. 2024 Jul-Aug;28(4):103838. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2024.103838. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Aspergillus species can colonize and infect immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Conventional fungal identification depends on microscopic analysis and microorganism medium growth. Other diagnostic methods, non-growth dependent, to invasive fungal infections, are the biomarkers that detect circulating polysaccharides, for example, 1-3-β-d-Glucan and galactomannan. Both are polysaccharides present on the external layer of fungi cell wall and can be detected in clinical samples during the growth of the fungus in the patient. This study aimed to compare the galactomannan detection of Lateral Flow Assay and Enzyme Immunoassay methods in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid. The galactomannan antigen in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid was measured using Enzyme Immunoassay according to the manufacturer's instructions (PLATELIA ASPERGILLUS™ BioRad) and, using a Lateral Flow Assay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Galactomannan LFA IMMY©). The 71 samples were Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of patients hospitalized at Unicamp Clinical Hospital between 2019 and 2021; of these samples 12/71 (16.9 %) resulted in positive Galactomannan-Lateral Flow Assay. In contrast, Galactomannan-Enzyme Immunoassay resulted as positive in 9/71 (12.6 %) samples, a difference that showed not significant statistically (p-value = 0.36) Comparing both assays' results identified 8 divergences between them, about 11 % of the total sample. The Sensitivity (73.3 %), Specificity (92.35 %), Positive Predictive Value (62.85 %) and Negative Predictive Value (95.15 %) of Lateral Flow Assay were calculated using the Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay as standard. The Lateral Flow Assay demonstrated good results when compared with the Enzyme Immunoassay.
曲霉属真菌可定植并感染免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下的宿主。传统的真菌鉴定依赖于显微镜分析和微生物在培养基中的生长情况。其他非生长依赖性的侵袭性真菌感染诊断方法是检测循环多糖的生物标志物,例如1,3-β-D-葡聚糖和半乳甘露聚糖。这两种物质都是真菌细胞壁外层存在的多糖,在患者体内真菌生长过程中可在临床样本中检测到。本研究旨在比较支气管肺泡灌洗术中侧流免疫测定法和酶免疫测定法对半乳甘露聚糖的检测情况。按照制造商的说明(BioRad公司的PLATELIA ASPERGILLUS™),使用酶免疫测定法测量支气管肺泡灌洗液中的半乳甘露聚糖抗原;按照制造商的说明(IMMY公司的Galactomannan LFA),使用侧流免疫测定法进行测量。这71份样本为2019年至2021年在坎皮纳斯大学临床医院住院患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液;其中12/71(16.9%)份样本的半乳甘露聚糖侧流免疫测定结果为阳性。相比之下,半乳甘露聚糖酶免疫测定在9/71(12.6%)份样本中呈阳性,差异无统计学意义(p值 = 0.36)。比较两种检测方法的结果发现,它们之间存在8处差异,约占总样本的11%。以半乳甘露聚糖酶免疫测定为标准,计算出侧流免疫测定的灵敏度(73.3%)、特异性(92.35%)、阳性预测值(62.85%)和阴性预测值(95.15%)。与酶免疫测定法相比,侧流免疫测定法显示出良好的结果。