Suppr超能文献

GRAPPA 辩论:中重度银屑病常规治疗后,靶向小分子药物与生物制剂作为一线全身治疗药物的比较。

GRAPPA Debate: Targeted Small Molecules Versus Biologics as First-Line Systemic Therapy After Conventional Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.

机构信息

W. Liao, MD, Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;

A.W. Armstrong, MD, MPH, Division of Dermatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 1;51(Suppl 2):89-92. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0293.

Abstract

In this debate at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2023 annual meeting, arguments were made contrasting the first-line use of oral targeted small-molecule drugs vs biologic therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) after failure of conventional therapy. Arguments in favor of small-molecule drugs included good efficacy and safety, patient preference, cost savings, global health equity, and environmental stewardship. Arguments in favor of biologics included superior efficacy, excellent safety, availability of long-term data, pediatric regulatory approvals, and potential benefit for comorbidities. By the end of the debate, there was recognition of significant pros and cons of each approach. Both small-molecule drugs and biologic therapy are valuable options for PsO treatment, and their use can be tailored toward specific individuals or healthcare systems.

摘要

在 GRAPPA 2023 年年会的这场辩论中,与会者就传统疗法失败后中重度银屑病(PsO)的一线治疗选择,即口服靶向小分子药物与生物制剂治疗进行了辩论。支持小分子药物的观点包括疗效和安全性良好、患者偏好、成本节约、全球健康公平和环境管理。支持生物制剂的观点包括更好的疗效、出色的安全性、长期数据的可用性、儿科监管批准以及对合并症的潜在益处。辩论结束时,人们认识到每种方法都有显著的优点和缺点。小分子药物和生物制剂都是治疗银屑病的有价值的选择,其使用可以根据特定个体或医疗体系进行调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验