• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上消化道手术患者教育在线材料的可读性。

Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.

机构信息

College of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5259-5265. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z
PMID:39009725
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Health literacy is the ability of individuals to use basic health information and services to make well-informed decisions. Low health literacy among surgical patients has been associated with nonadherence to preoperative and/or discharge instructions as well as poor comprehension of surgery. It likely poses as a barrier to patients considering foregut surgery which requires an understanding of different treatment options and specific diet instructions. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for foregut surgery.

METHODS

Using Google, the terms "anti-reflux surgery, "GERD surgery," and "foregut surgery" were searched and a total of 30 webpages from universities and national organizations were selected. The readability of the text was assessed with seven instruments: Flesch Reading Ease formula (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Coleman Liau Index (CL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), Automated Readability Index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF). Mean readability scores were calculated with standard deviations. We performed a qualitative analysis gathering characteristics such as, type of information (preoperative or postoperative), organization, use of multimedia, inclusion of a version in another language.

RESULTS

The overall average readability of the top PEM for foregut surgery was 12th grade. There was only one resource at the recommended sixth grade reading level. Nearly half of PEM included some form of multimedia.

CONCLUSIONS

The American Medical Association and National Institute of Health have recommended that PEMs to be written at the 5th-6th grade level. The majority of online PEM for foregut surgery is above the recommended reading level. This may be a barrier for patients seeking foregut surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the potential gaps in understanding of their patients to help them make informed decisions and improve overall health outcomes.

摘要

简介

健康素养是个人使用基本健康信息和服务做出明智决策的能力。手术患者的健康素养水平较低与不遵守术前和/或出院指导以及对手术理解不佳有关。对于考虑进行上消化道手术的患者来说,这可能是一个障碍,因为上消化道手术需要了解不同的治疗选择和特定的饮食指导。本研究的目的是评估和比较上消化道手术的在线患者教育材料 (PEM) 的可读性。

方法

使用 Google 搜索“抗反流手术”、“GERD 手术”和“上消化道手术”,共选择了 30 个来自大学和国家组织的网页。使用七种工具评估文本的可读性:Flesch 阅读舒适度公式 (FRE)、Gunning Fog (GF)、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平 (FKGL)、Coleman Liau 指数 (CL)、简单测词法 (SMOG)、自动阅读难度指数 (ARI)和 Linsear 写作公式 (LWF)。计算平均值和标准差。我们进行了定性分析,收集了信息类型(术前或术后)、组织、使用多媒体、包括其他语言版本等特征。

结果

上消化道手术的顶级 PEM 的总体平均可读性为 12 年级。只有一个资源的阅读水平建议为六年级。近一半的 PEM 包含某种形式的多媒体。

结论

美国医学协会和美国国立卫生研究院建议将 PEM 编写为 5-6 年级阅读水平。上消化道手术的大多数在线 PEM 都高于推荐的阅读水平。这可能是寻求上消化道手术的患者的障碍。外科医生应该意识到患者理解能力存在潜在差距,以帮助他们做出明智的决策并改善整体健康结果。

相似文献

1
Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.上消化道手术患者教育在线材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5259-5265. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.减重手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6519-6525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10153-3. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Readability, Reliability, and Quality Analysis of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials and Large Language Models on Meniere's Disease.基于互联网的梅尼埃病患者教育材料和大语言模型的可读性、可靠性及质量分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251360651. doi: 10.1177/19160216251360651. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
4
Readability of online patient education materials for cervical disc replacement.颈椎间盘置换术在线患者教育材料的可读性
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08942-6.
5
Improving the Readability of Institutional Heart Failure-Related Patient Education Materials Using GPT-4: Observational Study.使用GPT-4提高机构性心力衰竭相关患者教育材料的可读性:观察性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jul 8;9:e68817. doi: 10.2196/68817.
6
Can Artificial Intelligence Improve the Readability of Patient Education Materials?人工智能能否提高患者教育材料的可读性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2260-2267. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002668. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Currently Available Large Language Models Are Moderately Effective in Improving Readability of English and Spanish Patient Education Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics.目前可用的大语言模型在提高儿科骨科英语和西班牙语患者教育材料的可读性方面有一定效果。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-25-00267.
8
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.
9
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Education on Hospital Nutrition Diets: What Do Patients Want to Know?医院营养膳食的数字化教育:患者想知道什么?
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3314. doi: 10.3390/nu16193314.

本文引用的文献

1
Readability of American Society of Metabolic Surgery's Patient Information Publications.美国代谢外科学会患者信息出版物的可读性。
J Surg Res. 2024 Jan;293:727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.09.018. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.减重手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6519-6525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10153-3. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Spanish-language bariatric surgery patient education materials fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.
西班牙语肥胖症手术患者教育材料未能达到卫生保健读写能力标准。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6417-6428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10088-9. Epub 2023 May 2.
4
Updating Health Literacy for Healthy People 2030: Defining Its Importance for a New Decade in Public Health.更新健康素养以实现 2030 年健康人群:为公共卫生新时代定义其重要性。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2021;27(Suppl 6):S258-S264. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001324.
5
Communicating with diverse patients: How patient and clinician factors affect disparities.与不同患者沟通:患者和临床医生因素如何影响差异。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2186-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
7
Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in Asians, Latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California.加利福尼亚州的亚裔、拉丁裔和其他种族/族裔群体的健康素养低、英语水平有限和健康状况。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):82-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712621.
8
Reconstruction of circulation in the fingertip without vein repair in zone I replantation.I区再植术中不进行静脉修复的指尖血液循环重建。
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Nov;33(9):1597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.005.
9
Health literacy, cognitive abilities, and mortality among elderly persons.老年人的健康素养、认知能力与死亡率
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun;23(6):723-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0566-4. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
10
Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy.患者对食品标签的理解:读写能力和计算能力的作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.025.