Suppr超能文献

采用三种根管充填技术对两种硅酸三钙类根管封闭剂的孔隙率进行微 CT 测定。

Micro-CT determination of the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers applied using three obturation techniques.

机构信息

College of Dental Medicine, University of New England.

Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Oral Sci. 2024;66(3):163-168. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.24-0031.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Using X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the aim of this study was to measure the porosity of two tricalcium silicate sealers (EndoSequence BC and NeoSealer Flo) applied using three obturation techniques (single-cone, warm-vertical, and cold-lateral) to six single-rooted human teeth.

METHODS

Six extracted, single-rooted human teeth were shaped with ProTaper Next rotary files and obturated with EndoSequence BC or NeoSealer Flo sealers and gutta-percha (GP) using one of the three techniques above. Micro-CT was used to map the full length of the canals. Deep learning cross-sectional segmentation was used to analyze image slices of the apical (0-2 mm) and coronal (14-16 mm from the apex) regions (n = 230-261 per tooth) for the areas of GP and sealer, as well as porosity. Median (%) with interquartile range of porosity were calculated , and the results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

In the apical region, EndoSequence BC had significantly fewer pores than NeoSealer Flo with the single-cone obturation (% median-interquartile range, IQR: 0.00-1.62) and warm-vertical condensation (5.57-10.32) techniques, whereas in the coronal region, NeoSealer Flo had significantly fewer pores than EndoSequence BC with these two techniques (0.39-5.02) and (0.10-0.19), respectively. There was no significant difference in porosity between the two sealers for the cold-lateral condensation technique in both the apical and coronal regions.

CONCLUSION

For optimal obturation, the choice of technique and sealer is critical.

摘要

目的

本研究使用 X 射线微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)测量两种硅酸三钙密封剂(EndoSequence BC 和 NeoSealer Flo)的孔隙率,这两种密封剂分别采用三种根管充填技术(单根管、热垂直、冷侧方)充填到六颗人单根牙中。

方法

六颗离体的、单根的人牙使用 ProTaper Next 旋转锉预备,并使用上述三种技术中的一种分别用 EndoSequence BC 或 NeoSealer Flo 密封剂和牙胶(GP)充填。微 CT 用于对整个根管长度进行成像。使用深度学习的横截面分割方法对根尖(距根尖 0-2mm)和冠部(距根尖 14-16mm)区域的图像切片(每个牙 230-261 个切片)进行分析,以确定 GP 和密封剂的面积以及孔隙率。计算每个牙的根尖(0-2mm)和冠部(14-16mm 距根尖)区域的 GP 和密封剂的中位数(%)及四分位距(IQR),并用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对结果进行统计学分析。

结果

在根尖区域,与单根管充填和热垂直充填技术相比,EndoSequence BC 的孔隙率显著低于 NeoSealer Flo(%中位数-四分位距,IQR:0.00-1.62),而在冠部区域,与这两种技术相比,NeoSealer Flo 的孔隙率显著低于 EndoSequence BC(0.39-5.02)和(0.10-0.19)。在根尖和冠部区域,冷侧方充填技术的两种密封剂的孔隙率没有显著差异。

结论

为了获得最佳的根管充填效果,选择合适的技术和密封剂至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验