Murgatroyd Chris, Salontaji Kristina, Smajlagic Dinka, Page Christian, Sanders Faye, Jugessur Astanand, Lyle Robert, Tsotsi Stella, Haftorn Kristine, Felix Janine, Walton Esther, Tiemeier Henning, Cecil Charlotte, Bekkhus Mona
Manchester Met University.
Norwegian Sequencing Centre.
Res Sq. 2024 Jul 4:rs.3.rs-4257223. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4257223/v1.
Psychological stress during pregnancy is known to have a range of long-lasting negative consequences on the development and health of offspring. Here, we tested whether a measure of prenatal early-life stress was associated with a biomarker of physiological development at birth, namely epigenetic gestational age, using foetal cord-blood DNA-methylation data. Longitudinal cohorts from the Netherlands (Generation R Study [Generation R], n = 1,396), the UK (British Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children [ALSPAC], n = 642), and Norway (Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study [MoBa], n1 = 1,212 and n2 = 678) provided data on prenatal maternal stress and genome-wide DNA methylation from cord blood and were meta-analysed (pooled n = 3,928). Measures of epigenetic age acceleration were calculated using three different gestational epigenetic clocks: "Bohlin", "EPIC overlap" and "Knight". Prenatal stress exposure, examined as an overall cumulative score, was not significantly associated with epigenetically-estimated gestational age acceleration or deceleration in any of the clocks, based on the results of the pooled meta-analysis or those of the individual cohorts. No significant associations were identified with specific domains of prenatal stress exposure, including negative life events, contextual (socio-economic) stressors, parental risks (e.g., maternal psychopathology) and interpersonal risks (e.g., family conflict). Further, no significant associations were identified when analyses were stratified by sex. Overall, we find little support that prenatal psychosocial stress is associated with variation in epigenetic age at birth within the general paediatric population.
众所周知,孕期的心理压力会对后代的发育和健康产生一系列长期的负面影响。在此,我们利用胎儿脐带血DNA甲基化数据,测试了一种产前早期生活压力指标是否与出生时生理发育的生物标志物(即表观遗传胎龄)相关。来自荷兰(Generation R研究,n = 1396)、英国(英国埃文父母与儿童纵向研究,n = 642)和挪威(母婴队列研究,n1 = 1212,n2 = 678)的纵向队列提供了产前母亲压力以及脐带血全基因组DNA甲基化的数据,并进行了荟萃分析(合并n = 3928)。使用三种不同的孕期表观遗传时钟计算表观遗传年龄加速指标:“Bohlin”、“EPIC重叠”和“Knight”。根据汇总荟萃分析或各个队列的结果,作为总体累积评分进行检查的产前压力暴露与任何一种时钟下通过表观遗传估计的胎龄加速或减速均无显著关联。未发现与产前压力暴露的特定领域存在显著关联,包括负面生活事件、情境(社会经济)压力源、父母风险(如母亲精神病理学)和人际风险(如家庭冲突)。此外,按性别分层进行分析时也未发现显著关联。总体而言,我们几乎没有发现证据支持产前心理社会压力与一般儿科人群出生时表观遗传年龄的变化有关。