• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家集中带量采购政策对化学制药企业研发投入的影响:中国的双重差分分析。

Impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment: a difference-in-differences analysis in China.

机构信息

School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Xinhua Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1402581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402581. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402581
PMID:39011324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247172/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the National Centralized Drug Procurement (NCDP) policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment and provide references for improving NCDP policy design and encouraging innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.

METHODS

Using the panel data of 102 Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed enterprises from 2016 to 2022 under the chemical pharmaceutical classification of Shenwan in Wind database as the research sample, this study developed difference-in-differences (DID) models on bid-winning and bid-non-winning enterprises, respectively, to evaluate the impact of NCDP policy on their R&D investment. In addition, this study tested the heterogeneity of bid-winning enterprises based on the bid success rate, the decline of drug price, and enterprise size.

RESULTS

The NCDP policy could encourage chemical pharmaceutical companies to increase R&D investment, but the low bid success rate and excessive drug price reduction would reduce their R&D enthusiasm, especially for small- and medium-sized enterprises.

DISCUSSION

It is suggested that the NCDP policy should be further improved: first, revise the bidding rule of the NCDP policy and increase the bid success rate so that more enterprises can win bids, and second, to solve the problem of excessive drug price reduction, evaluate the rationality of bid-winning prices, and introduce a two-way selection mechanism between medical institutions and supply enterprises. Integrate pharmacoeconomic evaluation into the NCDP rules to form a benign competition among enterprises. Third, attention should be paid to supporting policies for small- and medium-sized enterprises. By increasing procurement volume, shortening payment time limits, and increasing the proportion of advance payments, enterprises' cash flow shortages can be alleviated, thus achieving fairness and inclusiveness in the implementation of the NCDP policy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估国家集中带量采购(NCDP)政策对化药企业研发投入的影响,为完善 NCDP 政策设计、鼓励医药行业创新提供参考。

方法

利用 Wind 数据库申万化学制药分类下 2016 年至 2022 年 102 家上海和深圳 A 股上市企业的面板数据,分别对中标和未中标企业进行双重差分(DID)模型,评估 NCDP 政策对其研发投入的影响。此外,还基于中标成功率、药品价格降幅和企业规模,对中标企业进行异质性检验。

结果

NCDP 政策能够激励化药企业增加研发投入,但低中标成功率和药品价格降幅过大,会降低企业研发积极性,尤其是中小企业。

讨论

建议进一步完善 NCDP 政策:一是修订 NCDP 政策的招标规则,提高中标成功率,使更多企业能够中标;二是解决药品价格降幅过大的问题,评估中标价格的合理性,引入医疗机构和供应企业的双向选择机制,将药物经济学评价纳入 NCDP 规则,形成企业间的良性竞争;三是关注对中小企业的支持政策,通过增加采购量、缩短付款期限、提高预付款比例等方式,缓解企业的现金流短缺问题,实现 NCDP 政策实施的公平性和包容性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/80217cd26011/fpubh-12-1402581-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/94242bfb1e65/fpubh-12-1402581-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/7a2762947442/fpubh-12-1402581-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/80217cd26011/fpubh-12-1402581-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/94242bfb1e65/fpubh-12-1402581-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/7a2762947442/fpubh-12-1402581-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f0/11247172/80217cd26011/fpubh-12-1402581-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of National Centralized Drug Procurement policy on chemical pharmaceutical enterprises' R&D investment: a difference-in-differences analysis in China.国家集中带量采购政策对化学制药企业研发投入的影响:中国的双重差分分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;12:1402581. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1402581. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of China's National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on pharmaceutical enterprises' financial performance: a quasi-natural experimental study.中国国家集中带量采购政策对制药企业财务绩效的影响:一项准自然实验研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1227102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1227102. eCollection 2023.
3
The impacts of national centralized drug procurement policy on drug utilization of medical institutions: an empirical study in a county-level hospital in China.国家集中带量采购政策对医疗机构药品使用的影响:基于中国一家县级医院的实证研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10964-7.
4
Influence of Chinese National Centralized Drug Procurement on the price of policy-related drugs: an interrupted time series analysis.国家组织药品集中采购对相关政策药品价格的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 19;21(1):1883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11882-7.
5
The impact of "4 + 7" volume-based drug procurement on the volume, expenditures, and daily costs of antihypertensive drugs in Shenzhen, China: an interrupted time series analysis.“4+7”量价采购对中国深圳地区降压药销量、支出和日均费用的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 26;21(1):1275. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07143-3.
6
The impact of centralized band purchasing of pharmaceuticals on innovation of Chinese pharmaceutical firms: an empirical study based on double difference models.集中带量采购政策对中国制药企业创新的影响:基于双重差分模型的实证研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 3;12:1406254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1406254. eCollection 2024.
7
Can the Profitability of Medical Enterprises Be Improved After Joining China's Centralized Drug Procurement? A Difference-in-Difference Design.集中采购后医疗企业的盈利能力能否提高?—基于倍差法的研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;9:809453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809453. eCollection 2021.
8
Effect of centralized volume-based procurement of drugs on business performance of listed pharmaceutical enterprises.药品集中带量采购对上市制药企业经营业绩的影响
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 17;10(12):e33198. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33198. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
9
Does China's national volume-based drug procurement policy promote or hinder pharmaceutical innovation?中国的药品集中带量采购政策促进还是阻碍了医药创新?
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1392239. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1392239. eCollection 2024.
10
The Impacts of National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on Drug Utilization and Drug Expenditures: The Case of Shenzhen, China.国家集中带量采购政策对药品使用和药品支出的影响:以中国深圳为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9415. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249415.

引用本文的文献

1
R&D investment and total factor productivity in China's pharmaceutical industry: The moderating effect of the centralized procurement policy.中国制药行业的研发投入与全要素生产率:集中采购政策的调节作用
PLoS One. 2025 May 19;20(5):e0324519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324519. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of China's National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on pharmaceutical enterprises' financial performance: a quasi-natural experimental study.中国国家集中带量采购政策对制药企业财务绩效的影响:一项准自然实验研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 3;11:1227102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1227102. eCollection 2023.
2
Does China's centralized volume-based drug procurement policy facilitate the transition from imitation to innovation for listed pharmaceutical companies? Empirical tests based on double difference model.中国的药品集中带量采购政策是否有助于上市制药企业从仿制药向创新药转型?基于双重差分模型的实证检验。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 30;14:1192423. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1192423. eCollection 2023.
3
Pharmaceutical Enterprises' R&D Innovation Cooperation Moran Strategy When Considering Tax Incentives.
制药企业研发创新合作考虑税收激励的 Moran 策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15197. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215197.
4
Can the Profitability of Medical Enterprises Be Improved After Joining China's Centralized Drug Procurement? A Difference-in-Difference Design.集中采购后医疗企业的盈利能力能否提高?—基于倍差法的研究
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;9:809453. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809453. eCollection 2021.
5
Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms' R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach.基于量的采购政策会促进中国制药企业的研发投资吗?一项事件研究方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;18(22):12037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212037.
6
Determinants of Growth in Prescription Drug Spending Using 2010-2019 Health Insurance Claims Data.利用2010 - 2019年医疗保险理赔数据分析处方药支出增长的决定因素
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 31;12:681492. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.681492. eCollection 2021.
7
Relationship between the number of hospital pharmacists and hospital pharmaceutical expenditure: a macro-level panel data model of fixed effects with individual and time.医院药师人数与医院药品支出的关系:个体和时间固定效应的宏观层面面板数据模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4907-2.
8
"4+7" city drug volume-based purchasing and using pilot program in China and its impact.中国“4+7”城市药品集中带量采购试点及其影响
Drug Discov Ther. 2019;13(6):365-369. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2019.01093.
9
Shaping Pharmaceutical Tenders for Effectiveness and Sustainability in Countries with Expanding Healthcare Coverage.制定具有扩展医疗保健覆盖范围的国家的有效和可持续性的药品招标
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Oct;16(5):591-607. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0405-7.
10
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.