Suppr超能文献

内镜下球囊扩张术治疗炎症性肠病回肠储袋肛管吻合口狭窄:一项系统评价和Meta分析

Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Strictures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Dahiya Dushyant Singh, Jena Anuraag, Bapaye Jay, Mohan Babu P, Kassab Lena L, Facciorusso Antonio, Chandan Saurabh, Kochhar Gursimran S

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2025 Apr 10;31(4):944-951. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae128.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for medically refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess outcomes and safety of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) for IPAA strictures.

METHODS

A systematic search of numerous databases was performed through June 2023 to identify studies reporting on the outcomes of EBD in pouch-related strictures. Outcomes included technical success, clinical success at index dilation and in pouch retention, recurrence of symptoms post-EBD, and adverse events of EBD. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and results were expressed in terms of pooled rates along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran Q statistical test with I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 504 patients were included. The pooled rate of technical success and clinical success of index dilatation was 98.9% (95% CI, 94.8-99.8%; I20%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 7.1-71%; I20%), respectively. The pooled rate of clinical success in pouch retention without the need for additional surgery was 81.4% (95% CI, 69.6-89.3%; I272%). The pooled failure rate of EBD was 18.6% (95% CI, 10.7-30.4%, I272%). The pooled rate of recurrence of symptoms after index dilatation was 58.9% (95% CI, 33.3-80.5%; I213%). The pooled rate of serious adverse events was 1.8% (95% CI, 1-3.5%, I20%). No deaths related to EBD were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic balloon dilatation is safe and highly effective for management of IPAA strictures. Additional studies are needed to compare its efficacy with surgical interventions.

摘要

背景

回肠储袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)的修复性直肠结肠切除术是治疗药物难治性炎症性肠病(IBD)的首选方法。在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们评估了内镜球囊扩张术(EBD)治疗IPAA狭窄的疗效和安全性。

方法

截至2023年6月,对众多数据库进行了系统检索,以确定报告EBD治疗储袋相关狭窄疗效的研究。疗效包括技术成功率、初次扩张时和储袋保留时的临床成功率、EBD后症状复发情况以及EBD的不良事件。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,结果以合并率及相关95%置信区间(CI)表示。使用Cochran Q统计检验和I²统计量评估异质性。

结果

纳入7项研究,共504例患者。初次扩张的技术成功率和临床成功率合并率分别为98.9%(95%CI,94.8 - 99.8%;I² = 0%)和30.2%(95%CI,7.1 - 71%;I² = 0%)。无需额外手术的储袋保留临床成功率合并率为81.4%(95%CI,69.6 - 89.3%;I² = 72%)。EBD的合并失败率为18.6%(95%CI,10.7 - 30.4%,I² = 72%)。初次扩张后症状复发的合并率为58.9%(95%CI,33.3 - 80.5%;I² = 13%)。严重不良事件的合并率为1.8%(95%CI,1 - 3.5%,I² =

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验