Department of Intensive Care Unit, Beijing Geriatric Hospital, Beijing, China.
Clin Respir J. 2024 Jul;18(7):e13808. doi: 10.1111/crj.13808.
Limited data is available regarding the weaning techniques employed for mechanical ventilation (MV) in elderly patients with dementia in China.
The primary objective of this study is to investigate diverse weaning methods in relation to the prognostic outcomes of elderly patients with dementia undergoing MV in the intensive care unit (ICU). Specifically, we seek to compare the prognosis, likelihood of successful withdrawal from MV, and the length of stay (LOS) in the ICU.
The study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial, encompassing a group of 169 elderly patients aged ≥ 65 years with dementia who underwent MV. Three distinct weaning methods were used for MV cessation, namely, the tapering parameter, spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), and SmartCare (Dräger, Germany).
In the tapering parameter group, the LOS in the ICU was notably prolonged compared to both the SBT and SmartCare groups. However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the groups with respect to demographic characteristics, such as age and sex, as well as factors including the rationale for ICU admission, cause of MV, MV mode, oxygenation index, hemoglobin levels, albumin levels, ejection fraction, sedation and analgesia practices, tracheotomy, duration of MV, successful extubation, successful weaning, incidences of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and overall prognosis.
Both the SBT and SmartCare withdrawal methods demonstrated a reduction in the duration of MV and LOS in the ICU when compared to the tapering parameter method.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900028449.
关于中国痴呆老年患者机械通气(MV)的撤机技术,可用数据有限。
本研究的主要目的是探讨不同的撤机方法与 ICU 中接受 MV 的老年痴呆患者预后的关系。具体来说,我们比较了预后、MV 成功撤离的可能性和 ICU 住院时间(LOS)。
该研究为随机对照试验,纳入 169 名年龄≥65 岁的痴呆老年 MV 患者。采用三种不同的 MV 停止撤机方法,即递减参数、自主呼吸试验(SBT)和 SmartCare(德国德尔格公司)。
在递减参数组中,与 SBT 和 SmartCare 组相比,ICU 的 LOS 明显延长。然而,三组之间在人口统计学特征(如年龄和性别)以及 ICU 入住理由、MV 原因、MV 模式、氧合指数、血红蛋白水平、白蛋白水平、射血分数、镇静和镇痛实践、气管切开术、MV 持续时间、成功拔管、成功撤机、呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率和总体预后等因素方面无统计学差异。
与递减参数方法相比,SBT 和 SmartCare 撤机方法均缩短了 MV 和 ICU 的 LOS。
中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR1900028449。