Renal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Biostatistics, Center for Research on Heath Care Data Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kidney360. 2024 Sep 1;5(9):1299-1310. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000512. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
There were no associations between biomarkers and patient-reported pain, fatigue, and depression in a large ESKD cohort at baseline. Compared with control, the Technology-Assisted stepped Collaborative Care intervention had a short-term impact on reducing inflammatory burden. Treatment modified the association between changes in symptoms and in certain proinflammatory biomarkers (TNF- and high sensitivity C-reactive protein) over time.
Patient-reported symptoms are associated with inflammation biomarkers in many chronic diseases. We examined associations of inflammation biomarkers with pain, fatigue, and depression in patients with ESKD and the effects of a Technology-Assisted stepped Collaborative Care (TĀCcare) intervention on these biomarkers.
In the TĀCcare multisite randomized control trial, data on patient-reported symptoms were collected at baseline and 3 and 6 months. Anti-inflammatory (IL-1 receptor agonist, IL-10), proinflammatory (TNF-, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6), and regulatory (IL-2) biomarkers were assayed. Linear mixed-effects modeling was used to examine within-group and between-group differences after adjusting for age, sex, race, and comorbidities.
Among the 160 patients (mean age 58±14 years, 55% men, 52% white), there were no significant associations between inflammation biomarkers and pain, fatigue, or depression at baseline. Both intervention and control groups demonstrated reductions in IL-10 and IL-1 receptor agonist over 6 months ( range=−1.22 to −0.40, range=<0.001–0.02) At 3 months, the treatment group exhibited decreases in TNF- (=−0.22, < 0.001) and IL-2 (=−0.71, < 0.001), whereas the control group showed increases in IL-6/IL-10 ratio (=0.33, = 0.03). At 6 months, both groups exhibited decreases in IL-2 ( range=−0.66 to −0.57, < 0.001); the control group showed significant increases in the ratio of IL-6/IL-10 (=0.75, < 0.001) and decrease in TNF- (=−0.16, = 0.02). Compared with controls, the treatment group demonstrated significantly decreased IL-2 at 3 months (=−0.53, < 0.001). Significant interaction effects of treatment were observed on the association between changes in proinflammatory biomarkers (TNF- and high sensitivity C-reactive protein) levels and changes in symptom scores from baseline to 6 months.
The TĀCcare intervention had a short-term impact on reducing inflammatory burden in patients with ESKD. More studies are needed to confirm our findings and to determine whether these biomarkers mediate the link between symptoms and disease progression.
: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03440853.
在基线时,在一个大型 ESKD 队列中,生物标志物与患者报告的疼痛、疲劳和抑郁之间没有关联。与对照组相比,技术辅助分步协作护理干预在短期内对减轻炎症负担有影响。治疗改变了症状变化与某些促炎生物标志物(TNF-和高敏 C 反应蛋白)之间随时间变化的关联。
许多慢性疾病中,患者报告的症状与炎症生物标志物相关。我们研究了 ESKD 患者中炎症生物标志物与疼痛、疲劳和抑郁的相关性,以及技术辅助分步协作护理(TĀCcare)干预对这些生物标志物的影响。
在 TĀCcare 多中心随机对照试验中,在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时收集了患者报告的症状数据。检测了抗炎(IL-1 受体激动剂、IL-10)、促炎(TNF-、高敏 C 反应蛋白、IL-6)和调节(IL-2)生物标志物。调整年龄、性别、种族和合并症后,采用线性混合效应模型来检验组内和组间差异。
在 160 名患者(平均年龄 58±14 岁,55%为男性,52%为白人)中,基线时生物标志物与疼痛、疲劳或抑郁之间没有显著关联。干预组和对照组在 6 个月内均表现出 IL-10 和 IL-1 受体激动剂的减少(范围=−1.22 至−0.40,范围<0.001-0.02)。在 3 个月时,治疗组 TNF-(=−0.22,<0.001)和 IL-2(=−0.71,<0.001)下降,而对照组 IL-6/IL-10 比值(=0.33,=0.03)增加。在 6 个月时,两组均表现出 IL-2 的减少(范围=−0.66 至−0.57,<0.001);对照组 IL-6/IL-10 比值(=0.75,<0.001)显著增加,TNF-(=−0.16,=0.02)减少。与对照组相比,治疗组在 3 个月时 IL-2 显著下降(=−0.53,<0.001)。治疗的显著交互作用在促炎生物标志物(TNF-和高敏 C 反应蛋白)水平与 6 个月时症状评分变化之间的关联上表现出显著的影响。
TĀCcare 干预在短期内对减轻 ESKD 患者的炎症负担有影响。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现,并确定这些生物标志物是否介导了症状与疾病进展之间的联系。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03440853。