Suppr超能文献

Hemospry在处理胃肠道肿瘤相关出血中的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析

The efficacy of Hemospray in managing bleeding related to gastrointestinal tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Abosheaishaa Hazem, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Ahmed Omar T, Elfert Khaled, Mohamed Islam, AlabdulRazzak Iyiad, Abdalla Monzer, Sethi Arshia, Abdelhalim Omar, Gayam Vijay Reddy, Eskaros Saphwat, Boulay Brian

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai/NYC Health + Hospitals Queens, New York City, New York, USA.

Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):1370-1383. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002828. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding stemming from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized, due to advancements in oncology and detection methods. Traditional endoscopic hemostatic techniques have shown variable success rates in managing hemorrhagic GI neoplasms. Hemospray, an emerging endoscopic hemostatic powder, offers promise in treating upper GI bleeding, potentially extending its utility to neoplastic bleeding sites. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate Hemospray's efficacy in managing bleeding related to GI tumors.

METHODS

We searched Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline/PubMed, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies focusing on malignancy-related GI bleeding and interventions utilizing Hemospray. Comparative studies contrasted Hemospray with standard endoscopic treatments (SET), while noncomparative studies assessed Hemospray's efficacy independently. The risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools, and statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager and open Meta analyst software.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies in our meta-analysis. Hemospray demonstrated higher rates of immediate hemostasis compared to SET (odds ratio: 17.14, 95% confidence interval: 4.27-68.86), with consistent outcomes across studies. Rebleeding rates at 14 and 30 days were comparable between Hemospray and SET groups, suggesting similar efficacy in long-term hemostasis. Hemospray showed a significantly lower need for nonendoscopic hemostasis compared to SET (odds ratio: 0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.87), indicating a potential reduction in supplementary interventions. Safety assessments revealed no confirmed adverse events directly linked to Hemospray.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis highlights Hemospray's efficacy in achieving immediate hemostasis in GI tumor-related bleeding, with potential benefits in reducing supplementary interventions and improving patient outcomes. Despite comparable rebleeding rates, Hemospray emerges as a valuable adjunctive therapy in managing malignant GI bleeding.

摘要

引言

由于肿瘤学和检测方法的进步,源自恶性肿瘤的胃肠道(GI)出血越来越受到关注。传统的内镜止血技术在处理出血性胃肠道肿瘤方面成功率各不相同。Hemospray是一种新兴的内镜止血粉末,在治疗上消化道出血方面显示出前景,可能将其应用扩展到肿瘤出血部位。本荟萃分析旨在评估Hemospray在处理与胃肠道肿瘤相关出血方面的疗效。

方法

我们检索了Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Medline/PubMed和Cochrane。纳入标准包括关注与恶性肿瘤相关的胃肠道出血以及使用Hemospray的干预措施的研究。比较研究将Hemospray与标准内镜治疗(SET)进行对比,而非比较研究则独立评估Hemospray的疗效。使用适当的工具评估偏倚风险,并使用Review Manager和开放式Meta分析软件进行统计分析。

结果

我们的荟萃分析纳入了19项研究。与SET相比,Hemospray显示出更高的即时止血率(优势比:17.14,95%置信区间:4.27 - 68.86),各研究结果一致。Hemospray组和SET组在14天和30天的再出血率相当,表明在长期止血方面疗效相似。与SET相比,Hemospray显示出显著更低的非内镜止血需求(优势比:0.51,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.87),表明辅助干预可能减少。安全性评估显示没有确认与Hemospray直接相关的不良事件。

结论

本荟萃分析突出了Hemospray在实现胃肠道肿瘤相关出血即时止血方面的疗效,在减少辅助干预和改善患者预后方面具有潜在益处。尽管再出血率相当,但Hemospray在处理恶性胃肠道出血方面成为一种有价值的辅助治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验