Bonding affinity and durability of recycled zirconia.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

While repurposing waste materials into zirconia blocks presents a promising avenue, uncertainty remains regarding whether the bonding properties of recycled zirconia align with those of commercially available zirconia.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding affinity and durability of composite resin to recycled zirconia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A series of processing steps were performed with recycled zirconia residuals (Lava Plus; 3M Oral Care), including pulverization, sieving, heating, compaction, isostatic pressing, and presintering. The presintered blocks of recycled zirconia (Group R) and commercially available zirconia (Group C) were sectioned and sintered to create test specimens (10×10×1.5 mm). After polishing and airborne-particle abrasion, specimens within each group were bonded to composite resin cylinders using a resin cement (Multilink Speed; Ivoclar AG). The specimens were then divided into 3 subgroups for shear bond strength (SBS) testing: no further treatment, 10 000 thermocycles, and 30 000 thermocycles (n=10). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), surface roughness, and contact angle were used to analyze the surface physicochemical differences between Groups C and R. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test for SBS values, Pearson chi-squared test for failure modes, and independent t test for grain size, surface roughness, and wettability (α=.05).

RESULTS

No significant difference was found in the SBS values between Group R and Group C (P=.403), while thermocycling significantly affected the SBS values (P<.05). Group R showed significantly greater R, R, and R values (P<.05) than did Group C. SEM analysis revealed that Group R exhibited more prominent grooves than Group C, while the XRD and EDS patterns exhibited similarities in both the crystalline phase and elemental composition. No significant difference was observed in the water contact angle between the 2 groups (P=.196).

CONCLUSIONS

The bonding protocol established for commercially available zirconia was comparable with that of recycled zirconia, but both decreased after thermocycling. The recycling process did not affect the crystalline phase or elemental composition of the zirconia, but it induced alterations in the surface roughness.