Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Sep;62(7):637-641. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
This double-blind, randomised clinical trial aimed to find out whether there is a difference in the prevalence of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) between patients who received 2% lidocaine and those who received 4% articaine during inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). Patients who underwent third molar extraction were randomised into two groups. IANB was performed using 2% lidocaine in Group 1 and 4% articaine in Group 2. The occurrence of NSD was documented. Patients were visited within 48 hours and one week after the tooth was removed. The type of anaesthetic drug (4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine) was the study's predictive factor. A total of 2400 patients were studied in two groups (1200 in each group). The mean (range) age of the patients was 28.40 (18-44) years. Five patients (0.41%) in the lidocaine group and seven (0.58%) in the articaine group had NSD after injection (p = 0.77). The prevalence of NSD after IANB was no higher in the articaine group than in the lidocaine group.
这项双盲、随机临床试验旨在探讨在接受下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)时使用 2%利多卡因和 4%阿替卡因的患者中,神经感觉障碍(NSD)的发生率是否存在差异。接受第三磨牙拔除的患者被随机分为两组。在第 1 组中使用 2%利多卡因进行 IANB,在第 2 组中使用 4%阿替卡因。记录 NSD 的发生情况。在拔牙后 48 小时和一周内对患者进行访视。麻醉药物的类型(4%阿替卡因与 2%利多卡因)是研究的预测因素。共有 2400 名患者在两组中进行了研究(每组 1200 名)。患者的平均(范围)年龄为 28.40(18-44)岁。利多卡因组中有 5 名患者(0.41%)和阿替卡因组中有 7 名患者(0.58%)在注射后出现 NSD(p=0.77)。阿替卡因组 IANB 后 NSD 的发生率并不高于利多卡因组。