• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[序贯法单纯单孔保乳切除术治疗不同象限早期乳腺癌的疗效]

[Effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in different quadrants].

作者信息

Zhou Qianhe, Liu Jianyu, Wang Wenzheng, Li Yingpu, Li Zhigao

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Heilongjiang, 150081, P. R. China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):793-800. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403083.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.202403083
PMID:39013814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252693/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery (SMPSL-BCS) in treating early-stage breast cancer patients with tumors in different quadrants.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 200 early-stage breast cancer female patients admitted between January 2023 and December 2023. According to the quadrant where the tumor was located, the patients were allocated into the upper outer quadrant group (UO group), lower outer quadrant group (LO group), upper inner quadrant group (UI group), and lower inner quadrant group (LI group), with 50 cases in each group. There was no significant difference ( >0.05) in the baseline data, including age, body mass index, smoking history, marital status, comorbidities, affected breast side, maximum tumor diameter on ultrasound, maximum pathological tumor diameter, clinical tumor stage, molecular subtype, and disease duration. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and extubation time were recorded and compared between groups. Additionally, the occurrence of early-stage complications (1-3 months after operation; including subcutaneous fluid accumulation, incision infection, superficial skin burns) and late-stage complications (>3 months after operation; including pectoralis major muscle adhesion, changes in breast appearance and shape, sensory discomfort) were assessed. At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcome of breast-conserving surgery was rated for all groups.

RESULTS

The UO group had the shortest operation time, followed by the UI group, LO group, and LI group, showing significant differences between groups ( <0.05). The UO group had the least intraoperative blood loss, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between UO group and LO group, which was not significant ( >0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( <0.05). The UO group had the least postoperative drainage volume, followed by the LO group, UI group, and LI group; except for the difference between LO group and UI group, which was not significant ( >0.05), the differences between the other groups were significant ( <0.05). The extubation time of the LI group was significantly longer than that of the other groups ( <0.05). All patients were followed up 4-12 months, with an average of 8 months. And 193 patients were followed up more than 6 months, including 48 patients in UO group, 47 in LO group, 49 in UI group, and 49 in LI group. In the early-stage period, the LI group had a higher incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation after tube removal compared to the UO group and LO group ( <0.05), while there was no significant difference in the incidences of other early complications between groups ( >0.05). In the late-stage period, the LI group had significantly higher incidences of pectoralis major muscle adhesion and changes in breast appearance and shape than UO group and LO group ( <0.05), and a significantly higher incidence of sensory discomfort than UO group ( <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidences of other late-stage complications between groups ( >0.05). At 6 months after operation, the cosmetic outcomes of breast-conserving surgery were significantly better in UO group, LO group, and UI group than in LI group ( <0.05); there was no significant difference between the other groups ( >0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of early-stage breast cancer using SMPSL-BCS, patients with tumors located in the upper outer quadrant show the best effectiveness. The effectivenesses are similar for patients with tumors in the lower outer and upper inner quadrants. However, patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant do not experience significant advantages. Therefore, it is recommended that SMPSL-BCS should not be the first-choice surgical method for patients with tumors in the lower inner quadrant.

摘要

目的

比较序贯法单纯单孔乳房肿瘤切除术-保乳手术(SMPSL-BCS)治疗不同象限早期乳腺癌患者的疗效。

方法

对2023年1月至2023年12月收治的200例早期乳腺癌女性患者进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤所在象限,将患者分为外上象限组(UO组)、外下象限组(LO组)、内上象限组(UI组)和内下象限组(LI组),每组50例。年龄、体重指数、吸烟史、婚姻状况、合并症、患侧乳房、超声最大肿瘤直径、最大病理肿瘤直径、临床肿瘤分期、分子亚型和病程等基线数据无显著差异(>0.05)。记录并比较各组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量和拔管时间。此外,评估早期并发症(术后1-3个月;包括皮下积液、切口感染、浅表皮肤灼伤)和晚期并发症(术后>3个月;包括胸大肌粘连、乳房外观和形状改变、感觉不适)的发生情况。术后6个月,对所有组保乳手术的美容效果进行评分。

结果

UO组手术时间最短,其次是UI组、LO组和LI组,组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。UO组术中出血量最少,其次是LO组、UI组和LI组;除UO组与LO组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)外,其他组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。UO组术后引流量最少,其次是LO组、UI组和LI组;除LO组与UI组差异无统计学意义(>0.05)外,其他组间差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。LI组拔管时间明显长于其他组(<0.05)。所有患者随访4-12个月,平均8个月。193例患者随访超过6个月,其中UO组48例,LO组47例,UI组49例,LI组49例。在早期,LI组拔管后皮下积液发生率高于UO组和LO组(<0.05),而其他早期并发症发生率组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在晚期,LI组胸大肌粘连和乳房外观及形状改变的发生率明显高于UO组和LO组(<0.05),感觉不适发生率明显高于UO组(<0.05)。其他晚期并发症发生率组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后6个月,UO组、LO组和UI组保乳手术的美容效果明显优于LI组(<0.05);其他组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

采用SMPSL-BCS治疗早期乳腺癌时,肿瘤位于外上象限的患者疗效最佳。外下象限和内上象限肿瘤患者的疗效相似。然而,内下象限肿瘤患者未显示出明显优势。因此,建议SMPSL-BCS不应作为内下象限肿瘤患者的首选手术方法。

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of sequential method pure single-port lumpectomy-breast conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in different quadrants].[序贯法单纯单孔保乳切除术治疗不同象限早期乳腺癌的疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):793-800. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403083.
2
Evaluation of the association between quantitative mammographic density and breast cancer occurred in different quadrants.评估不同象限乳腺钼靶定量密度与乳腺癌之间的关联。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3270-0.
3
Single incision for oncologic breast conserving surgery and sentinel node biopsy in early stage breast cancer: A minimally invasive approach.单一切口用于早期乳腺癌的保乳手术和前哨淋巴结活检术:一种微创方法。
Breast J. 2019 Jan;25(1):41-46. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13158. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
4
Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study.传统与肿瘤整形保乳手术或乳房切除术之间的客观决策:一项美学与功能的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb;43(2):303-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
[Influence of tumor location in patients with breast cancer on the sentinel node detection].[乳腺癌患者肿瘤位置对前哨淋巴结检测的影响]
Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):98-102. doi: 10.1157/13086251.
6
Significance of the resection margin and risk factors for close or positive resection margin in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.保乳手术患者切缘的意义及切缘接近或阳性的危险因素
J BUON. 2012 Jul-Sep;17(3):452-6.
7
[Clinical analysis of breast reconstruction with endoscopic-assisted harvesting of latissimus dorsi muscle flap for breast cancer].[内镜辅助背阔肌肌皮瓣切取用于乳腺癌乳房重建的临床分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Jul 15;38(7):801-806. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202403136.
8
Endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌的内镜辅助保乳手术。
World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):957-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0202-y.
9
Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.针对较大肿瘤的肿瘤整形保乳手术的短期安全性
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
10
Oncoplastic surgery for inner quadrant breast cancer: fish-hook incision rotation flap.内象限乳腺癌的肿瘤整形手术:鱼钩状切口旋转皮瓣
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Oct;87(10):E129-E133. doi: 10.1111/ans.13336. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-incision endoscope-assisted breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy: prospective SINA-BCS cohort study.单切口内镜辅助保乳手术及前哨淋巴结活检:前瞻性SINA-BCS队列研究
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1076-1079. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad059.
2
Comparing outcomes of single-port insufflation endoscopic breast-conserving surgery and conventional open approach for breast cancer.比较单孔充气式内镜保乳手术与传统开放性手术治疗乳腺癌的效果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 6;20(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02798-6.
3
Association of Long-term Oncologic Prognosis With Minimal Access Breast Surgery vs Conventional Breast Surgery.微创乳房手术与传统乳房手术对长期肿瘤预后的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Dec 1;157(12):e224711. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4711. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
5
Video-assisted Transaxillary Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method.视频辅助经腋下单侧乳晕保留乳房切除术和即刻基于假体的乳房重建:一种新颖且有前途的方法。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Feb;46(1):91-98. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02527-6. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
6
Current Status and Factors Influencing Surgical Options for Breast Cancer in China: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of 110 Hospitals.中国乳腺癌手术选择的现状及影响因素:一项对 110 家医院的全国横断面调查。
Oncologist. 2020 Oct;25(10):e1473-e1480. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0001. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Endoscopic assisted breast conserving surgery for breast cancer: Clinical outcome, learning curve, and patient reported aesthetic results from preliminary 100 procedures.内镜辅助保乳手术治疗乳腺癌:初步 100 例的临床结果、学习曲线和患者报告的美学结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;46(8):1446-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.020. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Less micrometastatic risk related to circulating tumor cells after endoscopic breast cancer surgery compared to open surgery.内镜乳腺癌手术后循环肿瘤细胞相关的微转移风险低于开放手术。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1070. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6158-3.
9
Current Trends in and Indications for Endoscopy-Assisted Breast Surgery for Breast Cancer: Results from a Six-Year Study Conducted by the Taiwan Endoscopic Breast Surgery Cooperative Group.台湾内镜辅助乳腺癌手术的现状及适应证:台湾内镜辅助乳腺癌手术协作组六年研究结果
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):e0150310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150310. eCollection 2016.