School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hypertens Res. 2024 Sep;47(9):2337-2350. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01798-1. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
The proportion of time that blood pressure (BP) readings are at treatment target levels, commonly referred to as time at target or time in therapeutic range (BP-TTR), is emerging as a useful measure for evaluating hypertension management effectiveness and assessing longitudinal BP control. However, method of determination for BP-TTR differs across studies. This review identifies variations in BP-TTR determination methodologies and its potential prognostic value for cardiovascular outcomes. Following PRISMA extension for scoping reviews guidelines, literature was systematically searched in Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Relevant clinical trials, observational studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and systematic reviews published in English were screened. Of 369 articles identified, 17 articles were included. Studies differed in the BP targets used (e.g., BP < 140/90 mmHg or 130/80 mmHg; systolic BP within 110-130 mmHg or 120-140 mmHg), BP-TTR measurement duration (range 24 h to 15 years), and calculation method (linear interpolation method, n = 12 [71%]; proportion of BP readings at target, n = 5 [29%]). Regardless of method, studies consistently demonstrated that higher BP-TTR was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular outcomes. Six of eight studies found the association was independent of mean achieved BP or last measured BP. Despite variation in methods of BP-TTR determination, these studies demonstrated the potential prognostic value of BP-TTR for cardiovascular outcomes beyond current BP control measures. We recommend standardization of BP-TTR methodology, with preference for linear interpolation method when BP measurements are few or less frequent, and proportion of BP readings method when large number of BP readings are available.
血压(BP)读数达到治疗目标水平的时间比例,通常称为目标时间或治疗范围内的时间(BP-TTR),作为评估高血压管理效果和评估纵向血压控制的有用指标正在出现。然而,BP-TTR 的测定方法在不同的研究中有所不同。本综述确定了 BP-TTR 测定方法的变化及其对心血管结局的潜在预后价值。根据 PRISMA 扩展的范围综述指南,系统地在 Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 中搜索文献。筛选了以英文发表的相关临床试验、观察性研究、队列研究、横断面研究和系统评价。在确定的 369 篇文章中,有 17 篇文章被纳入。研究在使用的 BP 目标(例如,BP<140/90mmHg 或 130/80mmHg;收缩压在 110-130mmHg 或 120-140mmHg 之间)、BP-TTR 测量持续时间(范围为 24 小时至 15 年)和计算方法(线性插值法,n=12[71%];目标血压读数的比例,n=5[29%])上存在差异。无论方法如何,研究一致表明,较高的 BP-TTR 与心血管结局风险降低相关。八项研究中的六项发现该相关性独立于平均达到的 BP 或最后测量的 BP。尽管 BP-TTR 测定方法存在差异,但这些研究表明,BP-TTR 对心血管结局的预后价值超出了当前的 BP 控制措施。我们建议标准化 BP-TTR 方法,当 BP 测量次数较少或较不频繁时,首选线性插值法,当有大量 BP 读数时,首选比例法。