Suppr超能文献

血压控制措施与心血管结局:一项前瞻性高血压队列研究。

Blood pressure control measures and cardiovascular outcomes: a prospective hypertensive cohort.

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Department of Cardiology, Helena Venizelou Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2022 Dec;31(1):228-235. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2022.2118662.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated whether blood pressure (BP) control measures, visit-to-visit BP variability, and time in therapeutic range (TTR) are associated with future cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 1,408 hypertensive patients without cardiovascular disease, we prospectively evaluated the incident major cardiovascular events over 6 years. In newly diagnosed patients, antihypertensive drug treatment was initiated. We estimated two markers of on-treatment BP control, (1) visit-to-visit BPV as the coefficient of variation of office systolic BP (BP-CV), and (2) TTR calculated as the percentage of office systolic BP measurements within 120-140mmHg across visits.

RESULTS

The hypertensive cohort (672 males, mean age 60 years, 31% newly diagnosed) had a mean systolic/diastolic BP of 142/87 mmHg. The mean number of visits was 4.9 ± 2.6, while the mean attained systolic/diastolic BP during follow-up was 137/79 mmHg using 2.7 ± 1.1 antihypertensive drugs. The BP-CV and TTR were 9.1 ± 4.1% and 45 ± 29%, respectively, and the incidence of the composite outcome was 8.3% ( = 117). After adjustment for relevant confounders and standardization to z-scores, BP-CV and TTR were associated with a 43% (95% CI, 27-62%) increase and a 33% (95% CI, 15-47%) reduction in the outcome. However, the joint evaluation of TTR and BP-CV in a common multivariable model indicated that a standardized change of TTR was associated with the outcome to a greater extent than BP-CV (mean hazard ratios of 30% vs. 24%, respectively). When combined with the higher BP standardized-CV quartile, the lower TTR quartile predicted the outcome by 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) compared to the inverse TTR and BP-CV quartile pattern.

CONCLUSION

High BP-CV or low TTR was associated with future cardiovascular events in a cohort of treated hypertensive patients. As a determinant, the extent of TTR value appears greater than BP-CV when these measures are considered in the same multivariable model.

摘要

目的

我们研究了血压(BP)控制措施、随访间 BP 变异性和治疗范围内时间(TTR)与高血压患者未来心血管结局的关系。

材料和方法

在 1408 例无心血管疾病的高血压患者中,我们前瞻性评估了 6 年内的主要心血管事件。在新诊断的患者中,开始进行降压药物治疗。我们评估了两种治疗中 BP 控制的标志物,(1)作为诊室收缩压(BP)变异系数的随访间 BP 变异性(BP-CV),以及(2)通过诊室收缩压测量值计算的 TTR,即在就诊时收缩压在 120-140mmHg 范围内的百分比。

结果

高血压队列(672 名男性,平均年龄 60 岁,31%为新诊断)的平均收缩压/舒张压为 142/87mmHg。平均就诊次数为 4.9±2.6 次,而在随访期间平均达到的收缩压/舒张压使用 2.7±1.1 种降压药物。BP-CV 和 TTR 分别为 9.1±4.1%和 45±29%,复合结局的发生率为 8.3%(n=117)。在校正相关混杂因素并标准化为 z 分数后,BP-CV 和 TTR 与结局的增加分别相关 43%(95%可信区间,27-62%)和减少 33%(95%可信区间,15-47%)。然而,在共同的多变量模型中联合评估 TTR 和 BP-CV 表明,标准化 TTR 变化与结局的相关性大于 BP-CV(平均危险比分别为 30%和 24%)。当与较高的 BP 标准化-CV 四分位距相结合时,较低的 TTR 四分位距与结局的相关性是 TTR 和 BP-CV 四分位距倒置模式的 2.3 倍(95%可信区间,1.1-5.4)。

结论

在接受治疗的高血压患者队列中,较高的 BP-CV 或较低的 TTR 与未来心血管事件相关。作为一个决定因素,当在同一多变量模型中考虑这些指标时,TTR 值的程度似乎大于 BP-CV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验